CRM-M-25371-2026 -1- 293 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-25371-2026 Date of Decision: 09.07.2026 Surjeet @ Surjeet Singh and …Petitioners others vs. State of Haryana and others …Respondents Coram : Hon’ble Mr. Justice N.S.Shekhawat Present : Mr. Sankalp Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Rajiv Sidhu, Sr. DAG, Haryana. Mr. Pankaj Attri, Advocate (through VC) for the respondents No.2 to 5. *** N.S.Shekhawat J. (Oral) 1. The instant petition has been filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 for quashing of FIR No.108 dated 26.02.2025 registered under Sections 109(1), 115, 127(2), 3(5) and 351(3) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 at Police Station Sirsa City, District Sirsa (Annexure P-1) along with all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 24.03.2026 (Annexure P-2) arrived at between the parties. 2. Vide order dated 06.05.2026, a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa Magistrate/trial Magistrate for getting their statements recorded with respect to the compromise dated 24.03.2026 (Annexure P-2). HEMLATA 2026.07.14 16:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-25371-2026 -2-

3. Pursuant to aforesaid order, the parties have appeared before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sirsa and got their statements recorded. Report dated 19.05.2026 has been received whereby after recording the statements of the parties, the Court below has shown its satisfaction that the compromise is genu-ine, voluntary and without any coercion or undue influence. 4. I have heard counsel for the parties and gone through the case file. 5. In the light of the satisfaction shown by the Court below and considering the offence for which the accused have been charged are not of serious nature, together with the fact that compromise will go a long way in ironing out the differences for betterment of future life of the parties and also in view of the law laid down in Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab and another, 2012 (4) RCR (Criminal) 543 and Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052, the present petition for quashing the FIR is allowed qua the petitioners. 6. Resultantly, FIR No.108 dated 26.02.2025 registered under Sections 109(1), 115, 127(2), 3(5) and 351(3) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 at Police Station Sirsa City, District Sirsa (Annexure P-1) along with all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 24.03.2026 (Annexure P-2) arrived at between the parties are hereby quashed qua the petitioners. (N.S.SHEKHAWAT) 09.07.2026 JUDGE hemlata Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No

HEMLATA 2026.07.14 16:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M-25371-2026 -1- 293 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-25371-2026 Date of Decision: 09.07.2026 Surjeet @ Surjeet Singh and …Petitioners others vs. State of Haryana and others …Respondents Coram : Hon’ble Mr. Justice N.S.Shekhawat Present : Mr. Sankalp Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Rajiv Sidhu, Sr. DAG, Haryana. Mr. Pankaj Attri, Advocate (through VC) for the respondents No.2 to 5. *** N.S.Shekhawat J. (Oral) 1. The instant petition has been filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 for quashing of FIR No.108 dated 26.02.2025 registered under Sections 109(1), 115, 127(2), 3(5) and 351(3) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 at Police Station Sirsa City, District Sirsa (Annexure P-1) along with all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 24.03.2026 (Annexure P-2) arrived at between the parties. 2. Vide order dated 06.05.2026, a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa Magistrate/trial Magistrate for getting their statements recorded with respect to the compromise dated 24.03.2026 (Annexure P-2). HEMLATA 2026.07.14 16:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-25371-2026 -2-

3. Pursuant to aforesaid order, the parties have appeared before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sirsa and got their statements recorded. Report dated 19.05.2026 has been received whereby after recording the statements of the parties, the Court below has shown its satisfaction that the compromise is genu-ine, voluntary and without any coercion or undue influence. 4. I have heard counsel for the parties and gone through the case file. 5. In the light of the satisfaction shown by the Court below and considering the offence for which the accused have been charged are not of serious nature, together with the fact that compromise will go a long way in ironing out the differences for betterment of future life of the parties and also in view of the law laid down in Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab and another, 2012 (4) RCR (Criminal) 543 and Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052, the present petition for quashing the FIR is allowed qua the petitioners. 6. Resultantly, FIR No.108 dated 26.02.2025 registered under Sections 109(1), 115, 127(2), 3(5) and 351(3) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 at Police Station Sirsa City, District Sirsa (Annexure P-1) along with all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 24.03.2026 (Annexure P-2) arrived at between the parties are hereby quashed qua the petitioners. (N.S.SHEKHAWAT) 09.07.2026 JUDGE hemlata Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No

HEMLATA 2026.07.14 16:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document