` 195 IIN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGGARH CWP-220270-2026 (O&M) Date off Decision: 08.07.2026 M/s Nisha Steeel Rolling Mills …Petitioner Vs. State of Punjaab and another …Respondents CORAM: HHON’BLE THE ACTING CHIIEF JUSTICE HHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHHIT KAPOOR Present: MMr. Yogesh Kumar Mittal, Advoocate for the petitioner. MMr. Saurabh Kapoor, Addl. AG, Punjab. *** ASHWANI KKUMAR MISHRA, A.C.J. (Orral) 1. TThe present writ petition has beeen filed seeking quashing of ordero dated 22.05.2024 (Annexure P/3) and order ddated 30.08.2024 (Annexure P/5), as the same has bbeen passed without affording ann opportunity of personal hearingg. 2. IIt is submitted that since the immpugned orders have been passed without affordding any opportunity of person al hearing, therefore, the impuggned action of the rrespondents amounts to violationn of principles of natural justice. 3. LLearned State counsel, who hass appeared on advance notice, doesd not dispute tthe factual aspects that opportuunity of personal hearing was not afforded to thhe petitioner. Learned State counnsel, therefore, states that the maatter can be convenniently remitted back to the conncerned authority, for conductingg the proceedings aafresh in accordance with laww after affording an opportunityy of personal heariing to the petitioner. 4. IIn view of the fair stand taken by the respondents, the impuggned order dated 222.05.2024 (Annexure P/3) and order dated 30.08.2024 (Annexxure

RAJESH KUMAR 2026.07.09 14:57 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. CWP-20270-2026 (O&M) [2] P/5), are set aside and the matter is remitted back to the authority concerned, with a direction to proceed afresh in accordance with law after affording an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner. It is further provided that no coercive action henceforth shall be taken in the matter and any recovery already made shall abide by the fresh orders to be passed in accordance with law. 5. Petition stands disposed of accordingly. 6. All pending misc. application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA) ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE (ROHIT KAPOOR) JUDGE 08.07.2026 rajesh 1. Whether speaking/reasoned? : Yes/No 2. Whether reportable? : Yes/No RAJESH KUMAR 2026.07.09 14:57 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.

` 195 IIN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGGARH CWP-220270-2026 (O&M) Date off Decision: 08.07.2026 M/s Nisha Steeel Rolling Mills …Petitioner Vs. State of Punjaab and another …Respondents CORAM: HHON’BLE THE ACTING CHIIEF JUSTICE HHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHHIT KAPOOR Present: MMr. Yogesh Kumar Mittal, Advoocate for the petitioner. MMr. Saurabh Kapoor, Addl. AG, Punjab. *** ASHWANI KKUMAR MISHRA, A.C.J. (Orral) 1. TThe present writ petition has beeen filed seeking quashing of ordero dated 22.05.2024 (Annexure P/3) and order ddated 30.08.2024 (Annexure P/5), as the same has bbeen passed without affording ann opportunity of personal hearingg. 2. IIt is submitted that since the immpugned orders have been passed without affordding any opportunity of person al hearing, therefore, the impuggned action of the rrespondents amounts to violationn of principles of natural justice. 3. LLearned State counsel, who hass appeared on advance notice, doesd not dispute tthe factual aspects that opportuunity of personal hearing was not afforded to thhe petitioner. Learned State counnsel, therefore, states that the maatter can be convenniently remitted back to the conncerned authority, for conductingg the proceedings aafresh in accordance with laww after affording an opportunityy of personal heariing to the petitioner. 4. IIn view of the fair stand taken by the respondents, the impuggned order dated 222.05.2024 (Annexure P/3) and order dated 30.08.2024 (Annexxure

RAJESH KUMAR 2026.07.09 14:57 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. CWP-20270-2026 (O&M) [2] P/5), are set aside and the matter is remitted back to the authority concerned, with a direction to proceed afresh in accordance with law after affording an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner. It is further provided that no coercive action henceforth shall be taken in the matter and any recovery already made shall abide by the fresh orders to be passed in accordance with law. 5. Petition stands disposed of accordingly. 6. All pending misc. application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA) ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE (ROHIT KAPOOR) JUDGE 08.07.2026 rajesh 1. Whether speaking/reasoned? : Yes/No 2. Whether reportable? : Yes/No RAJESH KUMAR 2026.07.09 14:57 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.