CWP-8093-2025(O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH *** CWP-8093-2025(O&M) Date of decision : 08.07.2026 Sahab Singh ... Petitioner Versus Commissioner, Karnal Division and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present: Mr.Varun Veer Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioner (through V.C.). Mr. Pradeep Prakash Chahar, Addl.A.G. Haryana. Mr. Rajat Sheokand, Advocate for respondent no.4. *** VIKAS BAHL, J.(ORAL) CM-10719-CWP-2026 1. This is an application under Section 151 CPC read with Order 1 Rule 10 read with Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for impleading the legal representatives of deceased petitioner. 2. For the reasons stated in the application which is duly supported by an affidavit and the averments mentioned in the application, the present application is allowed subject to all just exceptions and the DAVINDER KUMAR 2026.07.09 11:25 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order / judgment CWP-8093-2025(O&M) 2 applicants are ordered to be impleaded as the legal representatives of the petitioner. 3. It is clarified that this Court has not adjudicated upon the right of the estate of the petitioner and the LRs have been impleaded only to pursue the present writ petition. 4. Amended memo of parties is taken on record. CWP-8093-2025

1. A perusal of the paper book would show that neither the application filed under Section 7(2) of the Haryana Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961 (amended up to date), nor the written statement has been annexed. There is nothing on record to show that the jamabandi, which is now sought to be relied upon, was produced before the authority or that the plea was taken that the land was earlier Jumla Mustarka Malkan Hasad Rasad Rakba.. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the present writ petition be disposed of but liberty be granted to the petitioner to revive the same after annexing the relevant documents. 3. Ordered accordingly. (VIKAS BAHL) JUDGE (SUBHAS MEHLA) JUDGE July 08, 2026. Davinder Kumar Whether speaking / reasoned Yes/No DAVINDER KUMAR Whether reportable Yes/No 2026.07.09 11:25 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order / judgment

CWP-8093-2025(O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH *** CWP-8093-2025(O&M) Date of decision : 08.07.2026 Sahab Singh ... Petitioner Versus Commissioner, Karnal Division and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present: Mr.Varun Veer Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioner (through V.C.). Mr. Pradeep Prakash Chahar, Addl.A.G. Haryana. Mr. Rajat Sheokand, Advocate for respondent no.4. *** VIKAS BAHL, J.(ORAL) CM-10719-CWP-2026 1. This is an application under Section 151 CPC read with Order 1 Rule 10 read with Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for impleading the legal representatives of deceased petitioner. 2. For the reasons stated in the application which is duly supported by an affidavit and the averments mentioned in the application, the present application is allowed subject to all just exceptions and the DAVINDER KUMAR 2026.07.09 11:25 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order / judgment CWP-8093-2025(O&M) 2 applicants are ordered to be impleaded as the legal representatives of the petitioner. 3. It is clarified that this Court has not adjudicated upon the right of the estate of the petitioner and the LRs have been impleaded only to pursue the present writ petition. 4. Amended memo of parties is taken on record. CWP-8093-2025

1. A perusal of the paper book would show that neither the application filed under Section 7(2) of the Haryana Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961 (amended up to date), nor the written statement has been annexed. There is nothing on record to show that the jamabandi, which is now sought to be relied upon, was produced before the authority or that the plea was taken that the land was earlier Jumla Mustarka Malkan Hasad Rasad Rakba.. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the present writ petition be disposed of but liberty be granted to the petitioner to revive the same after annexing the relevant documents. 3. Ordered accordingly. (VIKAS BAHL) JUDGE (SUBHAS MEHLA) JUDGE July 08, 2026. Davinder Kumar Whether speaking / reasoned Yes/No DAVINDER KUMAR Whether reportable Yes/No 2026.07.09 11:25 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order / judgment