CWP-16295-22026 -1- IN TTHE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGAARH 115 CCWP-16295-2026 DDate of Decision: 08.07.2026 DAKSYA ACCADEMY PRIVATE LIMITEDD …Petitioner(s) Versus HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL AND INFRASTRUCTUREE DEVELOPMMENT CORPORATION LIMITTED AND OTHERS …Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBBHUVAN DAHIYA Present:- MMr. Uday Gupta, Senior Advocatee with MMr. Unmukt Gera, Advocate, Ms.. Neha Matharoo, Advocate and MMr. Sahil Matharoo, Advocate foor the petitioner. MMr. Deepak Bhardwaj, Advocate foor respondent no.1. MMr. Mandeep Singh, Advocate foor respondent no.2. TRIBHUVANN DAHIYA, J. (Oral) TThe petition has been filed, inter alia, seeking a writ off certiorari settiing aside the communication datted 12.08.2022, Annexure P-27,, issued by the first respondent - Haryana Staate Industrial and Infrastructuree Development Corporation Limited (HSIIIDC), whereby recovery off ₹2,51,02,156 along with interest has beenn ordered against the secondd respondent - AApparel Made-Ups and Home FFurnishing Sector Skill Councill (AMH SSC). 2. AApparently, the petitioner has appproached this Court after a delayy of about four yyears from the date of issuance of the recovery notice. Besides,, AMAN DUA 2026.07.15 09:34 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judicial document CWP-16295-22026 -2- the said noticce has been issued to the secoond respondent and not to thee petitioner.

3. Learned counsel for the Corporaation, on instructions from Mr.. Shailesh Dutt, Assistant General Manager of tthe Corporation, submits that soo far no action hhas been initiated against the petiitioner. 4. Faaced with the situation, learned senior counsel submits that thee remaining prayyers in the petition may be graanted, i.e., issuance of a writ off mandamus directing the Corporation to processs and release payments due andd payable to thee petitioner under the Skill Deveelopment Scheme in accordancee with the schemme framework, uninfluenced byy the impugned communication.. And also issuee skill certificates to the candidaates of the petitioner’s companyy who have succcessfully completed training and cleared the assessment process. 5. HHeard. 6. Itt is apparent on record that the MMemorandum of Understandingg (MOU) was entered into between the firs t and the second respondentss [HSIIDC and AAMH SSC] dated 23.10.2017, AAnnexure P-1, and the petitionerr herein enteredd into a separate agreement witth the second respondent, datedd 27.10.2017, AAnnexure P-2, for providing ski ll training to the candidates. Inn terms of the MMOU dated 23.10.2017, the paymments are required to be made byy the first respoondent to the second respondeent. This has been specificallyy provided unde r clause 3 thereof which reads ass under: 3.. Roles of HSIIDC

a. HSIIDC will make paymments to AMH SSC for projectt implementation as per the rrates finalized for various tradess under Eletronic Sector as pprescribed vide common normss notification dated 15.07.20 15 and 28.02.2017 (as amendedd AMAN DUA time to time). 2026.07.15 09:34 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judicial document CWP-16295-22026 -3- b. and c. xxx xxx xxxx In this view oof the matter, the directions souught by the petitioner cannot bee issued as it is not a party to the MOU entere d into between the first and thee second responndent whereunder no payments aare to be made to the petitioner.. Its right to gett payment, if any, arises out of tthe agreement dated 27.10.2017,, for which no ddirection can be issued to the firsst respondent - Corporation as itt is not privy to the contract. 7. Inn view thereof, there is no grounnd to entertain the petition and itt stands dismiss ed. (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA)) JUDGE 08.07.2026 Ad Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No AMAN DUA 2026.07.15 09:34 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judicial document

CWP-16295-22026 -1- IN TTHE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGAARH 115 CCWP-16295-2026 DDate of Decision: 08.07.2026 DAKSYA ACCADEMY PRIVATE LIMITEDD …Petitioner(s) Versus HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL AND INFRASTRUCTUREE DEVELOPMMENT CORPORATION LIMITTED AND OTHERS …Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBBHUVAN DAHIYA Present:- MMr. Uday Gupta, Senior Advocatee with MMr. Unmukt Gera, Advocate, Ms.. Neha Matharoo, Advocate and MMr. Sahil Matharoo, Advocate foor the petitioner. MMr. Deepak Bhardwaj, Advocate foor respondent no.1. MMr. Mandeep Singh, Advocate foor respondent no.2. TRIBHUVANN DAHIYA, J. (Oral) TThe petition has been filed, inter alia, seeking a writ off certiorari settiing aside the communication datted 12.08.2022, Annexure P-27,, issued by the first respondent - Haryana Staate Industrial and Infrastructuree Development Corporation Limited (HSIIIDC), whereby recovery off ₹2,51,02,156 along with interest has beenn ordered against the secondd respondent - AApparel Made-Ups and Home FFurnishing Sector Skill Councill (AMH SSC). 2. AApparently, the petitioner has appproached this Court after a delayy of about four yyears from the date of issuance of the recovery notice. Besides,, AMAN DUA 2026.07.15 09:34 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judicial document CWP-16295-22026 -2- the said noticce has been issued to the secoond respondent and not to thee petitioner.

3. Learned counsel for the Corporaation, on instructions from Mr.. Shailesh Dutt, Assistant General Manager of tthe Corporation, submits that soo far no action hhas been initiated against the petiitioner. 4. Faaced with the situation, learned senior counsel submits that thee remaining prayyers in the petition may be graanted, i.e., issuance of a writ off mandamus directing the Corporation to processs and release payments due andd payable to thee petitioner under the Skill Deveelopment Scheme in accordancee with the schemme framework, uninfluenced byy the impugned communication.. And also issuee skill certificates to the candidaates of the petitioner’s companyy who have succcessfully completed training and cleared the assessment process. 5. HHeard. 6. Itt is apparent on record that the MMemorandum of Understandingg (MOU) was entered into between the firs t and the second respondentss [HSIIDC and AAMH SSC] dated 23.10.2017, AAnnexure P-1, and the petitionerr herein enteredd into a separate agreement witth the second respondent, datedd 27.10.2017, AAnnexure P-2, for providing ski ll training to the candidates. Inn terms of the MMOU dated 23.10.2017, the paymments are required to be made byy the first respoondent to the second respondeent. This has been specificallyy provided unde r clause 3 thereof which reads ass under: 3.. Roles of HSIIDC

a. HSIIDC will make paymments to AMH SSC for projectt implementation as per the rrates finalized for various tradess under Eletronic Sector as pprescribed vide common normss notification dated 15.07.20 15 and 28.02.2017 (as amendedd AMAN DUA time to time). 2026.07.15 09:34 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judicial document CWP-16295-22026 -3- b. and c. xxx xxx xxxx In this view oof the matter, the directions souught by the petitioner cannot bee issued as it is not a party to the MOU entere d into between the first and thee second responndent whereunder no payments aare to be made to the petitioner.. Its right to gett payment, if any, arises out of tthe agreement dated 27.10.2017,, for which no ddirection can be issued to the firsst respondent - Corporation as itt is not privy to the contract. 7. Inn view thereof, there is no grounnd to entertain the petition and itt stands dismiss ed. (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA)) JUDGE 08.07.2026 Ad Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No AMAN DUA 2026.07.15 09:34 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judicial document