304. IN THHE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARRH CRM-M-29906-2026 Date of decision: 08.07.2026 Jeetu .... Petitioner Versus State of Harryana .... Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUURYA PARTAP SINGH Present: Mr. Gurdeep Singh Nehra, Advvocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Deepali Verma, AAG, Harryana. ----- SURYA PAARTAP SINGH, J. (ORAL) 1. This is a petition for anticipattory bail, filed by the petitionerr under Sectioon 482 of ‘the Bharatiya Nagar ik Suraksha Sanhita 2023’, in aa case arisingg out of FIR No.23, dated 28.001.2026, for the commission off offence punnishable under Sections 115, 117((2), 190, 191(3), 351(2) and 1099 (added laterron) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhhita, 2023, registered at Policee Station Dhaaruhera, District Rewari. 2. Vide order dated 22.05.2026, the petitioner was admitted too interim anticcipatory bail, subject to the conddition of furnishing bonds to thee satisfaction of arresting officer. It was also directed that the petitioner shalll join the inveestigation. SANJEEV KUMAR 2026.07.09 09:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-29906-2026 - 2 - 3. Reply has been filed by learned State counsel. The same be taken on record. 4. Heard.

5. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that in compliance with order dated 22.05.2026, the petitioner has already joined the investigation, and that nothing has been left to be recovered from the possession of petitioner. In view of above, the learned counsel for the petitioner has requested that the order dated 22.05.2026, be made absolute. 6. The learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Satinder, has submitted that the petitioner has joined investigation, and that for further investigation of this case his custodial interrogation is not required. 7. The record has been perused carefully. 8. Keeping in view the aforesaid submissions and the fact that the petitioner has already joined the investigation, it is hereby ordered that the petitioner is entitled for anticipatory bail. Hence, the present petition is hereby allowed and the order dated 22.05.2026, whereby the petitioner was accorded the benefit of interim anticipatory bail, is hereby made absolute. (SURYA PARTAP SINGH) JUDGE July 08, 2026 sanjeev Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No SANJEEV KUMAR 2026.07.09 09:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

304. IN THHE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARRH CRM-M-29906-2026 Date of decision: 08.07.2026 Jeetu .... Petitioner Versus State of Harryana .... Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUURYA PARTAP SINGH Present: Mr. Gurdeep Singh Nehra, Advvocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Deepali Verma, AAG, Harryana. ----- SURYA PAARTAP SINGH, J. (ORAL) 1. This is a petition for anticipattory bail, filed by the petitionerr under Sectioon 482 of ‘the Bharatiya Nagar ik Suraksha Sanhita 2023’, in aa case arisingg out of FIR No.23, dated 28.001.2026, for the commission off offence punnishable under Sections 115, 117((2), 190, 191(3), 351(2) and 1099 (added laterron) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhhita, 2023, registered at Policee Station Dhaaruhera, District Rewari. 2. Vide order dated 22.05.2026, the petitioner was admitted too interim anticcipatory bail, subject to the conddition of furnishing bonds to thee satisfaction of arresting officer. It was also directed that the petitioner shalll join the inveestigation. SANJEEV KUMAR 2026.07.09 09:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-29906-2026 - 2 - 3. Reply has been filed by learned State counsel. The same be taken on record. 4. Heard.

5. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that in compliance with order dated 22.05.2026, the petitioner has already joined the investigation, and that nothing has been left to be recovered from the possession of petitioner. In view of above, the learned counsel for the petitioner has requested that the order dated 22.05.2026, be made absolute. 6. The learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Satinder, has submitted that the petitioner has joined investigation, and that for further investigation of this case his custodial interrogation is not required. 7. The record has been perused carefully. 8. Keeping in view the aforesaid submissions and the fact that the petitioner has already joined the investigation, it is hereby ordered that the petitioner is entitled for anticipatory bail. Hence, the present petition is hereby allowed and the order dated 22.05.2026, whereby the petitioner was accorded the benefit of interim anticipatory bail, is hereby made absolute. (SURYA PARTAP SINGH) JUDGE July 08, 2026 sanjeev Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No SANJEEV KUMAR 2026.07.09 09:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document