1 TATATATA No.1323No.No.No.132313231323 ofofofof 22025220252202522025 (O&M)(O&M)(O&M)(O&M) ININININ THETHETHETHE HIGHHIGHHIGHHIGH COURTCOURTCOURTCOURT OFOFOFOF PUNJAPUNJAPUNJAPUNJAABABABAB ANDANDANDAND HARYANAHARYANAHARYANAHARYANA ATATATAT CHANDIGACHANDIGACHANDIGACHANDIGAARHARHARHARH 105 CMCMCMCM No.No.No.No. 12568-125681256812568 CIICIICIICII ofofofof 2026202620262026 in/andin/andin/andin/and TransferTransferTransferTransfer ApplicApplicApplicAppliccationcationationation No.1323No.1323No.1323No.1323 ofofofof 2025202520252025 (O&M)(O&M)(O&M)(O&M) DateDateDateDate ofofofof DecisionDecisionDecisionDecisionn:n:n:n: 08.07.2026080808.07.2026.07.2026.07.2026 AMANPREETAMANPREETAMANPREETAMANPREET KKAURKKAURKAURKAUR ......Applicant..................ApplicantApplicantApplicant VsVsVsVs GURVINDERGURVINDERGURVINDERGURVINDER SSINGHSSINGHSSINGHSSINGH …..Respondent(s)…..Respondent(s)…..Respondent(s)…..Respondent(s) CORAM:CORAM:CORAM:CORAM: HONHONHONHONN'BLEN'BLEN'BLEN'BLEMR.MR.MR.MR.JUSTICEJUSTICEJUSTICEJUSTICEHARKESHHARKESHHARKESHHARKESHHHHHMANUJAMANUJMANUJMANUJ Present: Mr . Jaideep Verma, Advocate for the applicant. Mr . S.S. Swaich, Advocate and Ms . Deepika, Advocate for the resppondent. ****

HARKESHHARKESHHARKESHHARKESHMAMAMAMAANUJA,ANUJA,ANUJA,ANUJA,J.J.J.J.(Oral)(Oral)(Oral)(Oral) CMCMCMCM No.No.No.No. 12568-125681256812568 CIICIICIICII ofofofof 2026202620262026 Praayer in the present application mmoved on behalf of the applicaant-respondent is fo r preponing the date of hearing oof main case from 13.10.2026 too an earlier date. Nottice of the application. Leaarned counsel for the non-appliicant/applicant-wife accepts nottice and raises no obbjection against the prayer made in the application. In vview of the above and with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, hearing of the main case is preponed andd taken up today itself. Acccordingly, the application is dispposed of. CMCMCMCM No.No.No.No. 12569-125691256912569 CIICIICIICII ofofofof 2026202620262026 Forr the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowwed. Short reply filedd on behalf of the respondent-hussband is taken on record. MOHMED ATIK 2026.07.14 10:11 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment 2 TATATATA No.1323No.No.No.132313231323 ofofofof 22025220252202522025 (O&M)(O&M)(O&M)(O&M) MainMainMainMain casecasecasecase

[1].[1].[1].[1]. Thee applicant-wife, by way of prresent case, seeks transfer of casec bearing HMA/2HMA/2HMA/2HMA/228/202128/202128/202128/2021 (registered(registered(registered(registered onononon 18.11.2018.11.2018.11.2018.11.202020),2020)2020)2020) titled “GurvinderGurvinderGurvinderGurvinder SinghSinghSinghSingh Vs.Vs.Vs.Vs. AmanpreetAmanpreetAmanpreetAmanpreet KauKauKauKauur”,ur”ur”ur” filed under Section 9 of thhe Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 for restitution of coonjugal rights, at the instance of respondent-husband; from the Court of learnedd Principal Judge, Family Courtt at Fatehgarh Sahib, Punjab to the Court of learnedd Principal Judge, Family Court aat Rupnagar, Punjab. [2].[2][2][2] Briiefly stating, the alleged marrriage between the applicant anda respondent wass solemnized on 30.06.2020. TThatafter about one week of the marriage, the appplicant-wife at her own went too her parental house and since thhen did not return too her matrimonial house. Thereaafter, the above mentioned petittion for restitution of conjugal rights, came to be preferred at the instance of respondent-husbband. Thereupon, the present appplication seeking transfer therreof came to be filedd by the applicant-wife.

[3]. Leaarned counsel for the applicaant, inter alia, contends that the applicant-wife hhas also filed petition No.HMA//214/2021 under Section 11 of the Hindu Marriagee Act, 1955, before the Court oof learned Principal Judge, Fammily Court, Rupnagaar, wherein the respondent-husbband is regularly appearing. Itt is further submitte d that the applicant is working inn abroad and appearing through her her father, beinng attorney holder. However, due to old age of father of the applicant, he is not able to properly pursue th e petition filed by the respondeent-husband at Fateehgarh Sahib. Accordingly, a pprayer is made for transfer of the above mentioneed petition filed at the instancee of respondent-husband from the MOHMED ATIK 2026.07.14 10:11 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment 3 TATATATA No.1323No.No.No.132313231323 ofofofof 22025220252202522025 (O&M)(O&M)(O&M)(O&M) Court of learnedd Principal Judge, Family Courtt at Fatehgarh Sahib, Punjab to the Court of learnedd Principal Judge, Family Court aat Rupnagar, Punjab. [4].[4].[4].[4]. On the other hand, learned counssel for the respondent vehemenntly opposes the prayyer made on behalf of the applicaant. [5].].].]. I hhave heard learned counsel for the parties and gone through the paper-book.

[6].].].]. In tthe present case, admittedly, thhe applicant-wife has filed petittion No.HMA/214/2 021 under Section 11 of the Hinndu Marriage Act, 1955, before the Court of learnedd Principal Judge, Family Court, Rupnagar, wherein the respondeent-husband is regullarly appearing. [7].].].]. Furrthermore, the Hon’ble Supremee Court in its decision renderedd in ManjulaManjulaManjulaManjula SinghSinghSinghSingh ChouhanChouhanChouhanChouhan VersusVersusVersusVersus VishalVishalVishalVishal SinghSinghSinghSinghhhhh Chouhan,Chouhan,Chouhan,Chouhan, reported as “2019201920192019 (13)(13)(((13)(13)(( SCCSCCSCCSCC 660”660660660 heldd that, in the interest of both thee parties, all connected matrimonnial proceedings shoould ordinarily be heard by tthe same Court and, accordinggly, allowed the traansfer application therein. Rellevant paragraph nos.3 to 5 are extracted hereunnder:- “3. As per the submission of thhe appellant, two cases are alreeady pennding in Family Court, Bhopal, andd it will be in the interests of bothh the partrties to try all their cases in Bhopaal. Learned counsel for the responddent howwever, submits that it will suit to the appellant only, therefore, trannsfer mayay not be permitted. The fact remaiins that the respondent has to traveel to Bhohopalforconduct of othercases pennding in FamilyCourt,Bhopal. 4. We are of the view that it willl be in the interests of both the parrties thatatalltheir casesbe heardtogether bybythe sameCourt.

5. Therefore, H.M.A. Case No.71/2016 is transferred from Fammily Couurt,IndoretotheFamilyCourt,Bhhopal.” MOHMED ATIK 2026.07.14 10:11 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment 4 TATATATA No.1323No.No.No.132313231323 ofofofof 22025220252202522025 (O&M)(O&M)(O&M)(O&M) [8]. Connsidering the aforesaid facts aand circumstances, in the hummble opinion of this CCourt, since a petition under Secction 11 of the Hindu Marriage Act,A 1955 is pendingg adjudication at Rupnagar, thereefore, it would be in the interestt of both the partiees that all their cases be heaard together by the same Court. Consequently thhe transfer application is allowedallowedallowedalloweddddd and the petition under Section 99 of the Hindu Marrriage Act i.e. HMA/28/2021HMA/28/2021HMA/28/2021HMA/28/2021 (registered(registered(registered(registered onononon 18.11.2020),18.11.2020)18.11.2020)18.11.2020) tittled “GurvinderGurvinderGurvinderGurvinder SingSingSingSingnghnghghgh Vs.Vs.Vs.Vs. AmanpreetAmanpreetAmanpreetAmanpreet Kaur”,Kaur”Kaur”Kaur” filed by the respondent-husband, stannds transferred fromm the Court of learned Principall Judge, Family Court at Fatehggarh Sahib, Punjab too the Court of learned Principall Judge, Family Court at Rupnaggar, Punjab. The reqquisite record of the aforesaid ccase be sent by the learned Fammily Court, Fatehgarhh Sahib to the Court concerned. [9]. Pennding miscellaneous application((s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.

(HA(HA(HA(HAARKESHARKESHARKESHARKESH MANUJA)MANUJA)MANUJA)MANUJA) JulyJulyJulyJuly 08,080808,,, 2026202020262626 JUDGEJUDGEJUDGEJUDGE Atik Whhether speaking/reasoned Yess/No Whhether reportable Yess/No MOHMED ATIK 2026.07.14 10:11 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

1 TATATATA No.1323No.No.No.132313231323 ofofofof 22025220252202522025 (O&M)(O&M)(O&M)(O&M) ININININ THETHETHETHE HIGHHIGHHIGHHIGH COURTCOURTCOURTCOURT OFOFOFOF PUNJAPUNJAPUNJAPUNJAABABABAB ANDANDANDAND HARYANAHARYANAHARYANAHARYANA ATATATAT CHANDIGACHANDIGACHANDIGACHANDIGAARHARHARHARH 105 CMCMCMCM No.No.No.No. 12568-125681256812568 CIICIICIICII ofofofof 2026202620262026 in/andin/andin/andin/and TransferTransferTransferTransfer ApplicApplicApplicAppliccationcationationation No.1323No.1323No.1323No.1323 ofofofof 2025202520252025 (O&M)(O&M)(O&M)(O&M) DateDateDateDate ofofofof DecisionDecisionDecisionDecisionn:n:n:n: 08.07.2026080808.07.2026.07.2026.07.2026 AMANPREETAMANPREETAMANPREETAMANPREET KKAURKKAURKAURKAUR ......Applicant..................ApplicantApplicantApplicant VsVsVsVs GURVINDERGURVINDERGURVINDERGURVINDER SSINGHSSINGHSSINGHSSINGH …..Respondent(s)…..Respondent(s)…..Respondent(s)…..Respondent(s) CORAM:CORAM:CORAM:CORAM: HONHONHONHONN'BLEN'BLEN'BLEN'BLEMR.MR.MR.MR.JUSTICEJUSTICEJUSTICEJUSTICEHARKESHHARKESHHARKESHHARKESHHHHHMANUJAMANUJMANUJMANUJ Present: Mr . Jaideep Verma, Advocate for the applicant. Mr . S.S. Swaich, Advocate and Ms . Deepika, Advocate for the resppondent. ****

HARKESHHARKESHHARKESHHARKESHMAMAMAMAANUJA,ANUJA,ANUJA,ANUJA,J.J.J.J.(Oral)(Oral)(Oral)(Oral) CMCMCMCM No.No.No.No. 12568-125681256812568 CIICIICIICII ofofofof 2026202620262026 Praayer in the present application mmoved on behalf of the applicaant-respondent is fo r preponing the date of hearing oof main case from 13.10.2026 too an earlier date. Nottice of the application. Leaarned counsel for the non-appliicant/applicant-wife accepts nottice and raises no obbjection against the prayer made in the application. In vview of the above and with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, hearing of the main case is preponed andd taken up today itself. Acccordingly, the application is dispposed of. CMCMCMCM No.No.No.No. 12569-125691256912569 CIICIICIICII ofofofof 2026202620262026 Forr the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowwed. Short reply filedd on behalf of the respondent-hussband is taken on record. MOHMED ATIK 2026.07.14 10:11 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment 2 TATATATA No.1323No.No.No.132313231323 ofofofof 22025220252202522025 (O&M)(O&M)(O&M)(O&M) MainMainMainMain casecasecasecase

[1].[1].[1].[1]. Thee applicant-wife, by way of prresent case, seeks transfer of casec bearing HMA/2HMA/2HMA/2HMA/228/202128/202128/202128/2021 (registered(registered(registered(registered onononon 18.11.2018.11.2018.11.2018.11.202020),2020)2020)2020) titled “GurvinderGurvinderGurvinderGurvinder SinghSinghSinghSingh Vs.Vs.Vs.Vs. AmanpreetAmanpreetAmanpreetAmanpreet KauKauKauKauur”,ur”ur”ur” filed under Section 9 of thhe Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 for restitution of coonjugal rights, at the instance of respondent-husband; from the Court of learnedd Principal Judge, Family Courtt at Fatehgarh Sahib, Punjab to the Court of learnedd Principal Judge, Family Court aat Rupnagar, Punjab. [2].[2][2][2] Briiefly stating, the alleged marrriage between the applicant anda respondent wass solemnized on 30.06.2020. TThatafter about one week of the marriage, the appplicant-wife at her own went too her parental house and since thhen did not return too her matrimonial house. Thereaafter, the above mentioned petittion for restitution of conjugal rights, came to be preferred at the instance of respondent-husbband. Thereupon, the present appplication seeking transfer therreof came to be filedd by the applicant-wife.

[3]. Leaarned counsel for the applicaant, inter alia, contends that the applicant-wife hhas also filed petition No.HMA//214/2021 under Section 11 of the Hindu Marriagee Act, 1955, before the Court oof learned Principal Judge, Fammily Court, Rupnagaar, wherein the respondent-husbband is regularly appearing. Itt is further submitte d that the applicant is working inn abroad and appearing through her her father, beinng attorney holder. However, due to old age of father of the applicant, he is not able to properly pursue th e petition filed by the respondeent-husband at Fateehgarh Sahib. Accordingly, a pprayer is made for transfer of the above mentioneed petition filed at the instancee of respondent-husband from the MOHMED ATIK 2026.07.14 10:11 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment 3 TATATATA No.1323No.No.No.132313231323 ofofofof 22025220252202522025 (O&M)(O&M)(O&M)(O&M) Court of learnedd Principal Judge, Family Courtt at Fatehgarh Sahib, Punjab to the Court of learnedd Principal Judge, Family Court aat Rupnagar, Punjab. [4].[4].[4].[4]. On the other hand, learned counssel for the respondent vehemenntly opposes the prayyer made on behalf of the applicaant. [5].].].]. I hhave heard learned counsel for the parties and gone through the paper-book.

[6].].].]. In tthe present case, admittedly, thhe applicant-wife has filed petittion No.HMA/214/2 021 under Section 11 of the Hinndu Marriage Act, 1955, before the Court of learnedd Principal Judge, Family Court, Rupnagar, wherein the respondeent-husband is regullarly appearing. [7].].].]. Furrthermore, the Hon’ble Supremee Court in its decision renderedd in ManjulaManjulaManjulaManjula SinghSinghSinghSingh ChouhanChouhanChouhanChouhan VersusVersusVersusVersus VishalVishalVishalVishal SinghSinghSinghSinghhhhh Chouhan,Chouhan,Chouhan,Chouhan, reported as “2019201920192019 (13)(13)(((13)(13)(( SCCSCCSCCSCC 660”660660660 heldd that, in the interest of both thee parties, all connected matrimonnial proceedings shoould ordinarily be heard by tthe same Court and, accordinggly, allowed the traansfer application therein. Rellevant paragraph nos.3 to 5 are extracted hereunnder:- “3. As per the submission of thhe appellant, two cases are alreeady pennding in Family Court, Bhopal, andd it will be in the interests of bothh the partrties to try all their cases in Bhopaal. Learned counsel for the responddent howwever, submits that it will suit to the appellant only, therefore, trannsfer mayay not be permitted. The fact remaiins that the respondent has to traveel to Bhohopalforconduct of othercases pennding in FamilyCourt,Bhopal. 4. We are of the view that it willl be in the interests of both the parrties thatatalltheir casesbe heardtogether bybythe sameCourt.

5. Therefore, H.M.A. Case No.71/2016 is transferred from Fammily Couurt,IndoretotheFamilyCourt,Bhhopal.” MOHMED ATIK 2026.07.14 10:11 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment 4 TATATATA No.1323No.No.No.132313231323 ofofofof 22025220252202522025 (O&M)(O&M)(O&M)(O&M) [8]. Connsidering the aforesaid facts aand circumstances, in the hummble opinion of this CCourt, since a petition under Secction 11 of the Hindu Marriage Act,A 1955 is pendingg adjudication at Rupnagar, thereefore, it would be in the interestt of both the partiees that all their cases be heaard together by the same Court. Consequently thhe transfer application is allowedallowedallowedalloweddddd and the petition under Section 99 of the Hindu Marrriage Act i.e. HMA/28/2021HMA/28/2021HMA/28/2021HMA/28/2021 (registered(registered(registered(registered onononon 18.11.2020),18.11.2020)18.11.2020)18.11.2020) tittled “GurvinderGurvinderGurvinderGurvinder SingSingSingSingnghnghghgh Vs.Vs.Vs.Vs. AmanpreetAmanpreetAmanpreetAmanpreet Kaur”,Kaur”Kaur”Kaur” filed by the respondent-husband, stannds transferred fromm the Court of learned Principall Judge, Family Court at Fatehggarh Sahib, Punjab too the Court of learned Principall Judge, Family Court at Rupnaggar, Punjab. The reqquisite record of the aforesaid ccase be sent by the learned Fammily Court, Fatehgarhh Sahib to the Court concerned. [9]. Pennding miscellaneous application((s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.

(HA(HA(HA(HAARKESHARKESHARKESHARKESH MANUJA)MANUJA)MANUJA)MANUJA) JulyJulyJulyJuly 08,080808,,, 2026202020262626 JUDGEJUDGEJUDGEJUDGE Atik Whhether speaking/reasoned Yess/No Whhether reportable Yess/No MOHMED ATIK 2026.07.14 10:11 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment