115 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-8102-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision:7th July, 2026. ARUDRA ENGINEERS PRIVATE LTD. .…...Petitioner(s) V/s STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER ......Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHIT KAPOOR Present None for the petitioner. Mr. Sourabh Goel, Addl. A.G., Haryana. **** ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA, A.C.J. (Oral) 1. Despite the matter being called twice, none has appeared on behalf of the petitioner. 2. Prayer in this Writ Petition is to command the respondents to consider the petitioner’s application for refund of `29,96,530/- in respect of the amount of VAT/TDS, wrongfully deducted and deposited with the respondents. 3. Learned State counsel placed before this Court order passed by the competent authority rejecting the claim of the petitioner for refund of the aforementioned amount. 4. In such circumstances, the cause raised in this writ petition no longer survives. Accordingly, while reserving liberty to the petitioner to pursue an appropriate remedy against the order rejecting its claim, the writ petition stands dismissed. SURESH KUMAR 2026.07.09 17:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-8102-2026 (O&M) Page 2 of 2 5. Pending applications, if any, are disposed of accordingly. [ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA] ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE [ROHIT KAPOOR] JUDGE July 7, 2026 Ess Kay Whether speaking / reasoned : Yes / No Whether Reportable : Yes / No

SURESH KUMAR 2026.07.09 17:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

115 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-8102-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision:7th July, 2026. ARUDRA ENGINEERS PRIVATE LTD. .…...Petitioner(s) V/s STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER ......Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHIT KAPOOR Present None for the petitioner. Mr. Sourabh Goel, Addl. A.G., Haryana. **** ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA, A.C.J. (Oral) 1. Despite the matter being called twice, none has appeared on behalf of the petitioner. 2. Prayer in this Writ Petition is to command the respondents to consider the petitioner’s application for refund of `29,96,530/- in respect of the amount of VAT/TDS, wrongfully deducted and deposited with the respondents. 3. Learned State counsel placed before this Court order passed by the competent authority rejecting the claim of the petitioner for refund of the aforementioned amount. 4. In such circumstances, the cause raised in this writ petition no longer survives. Accordingly, while reserving liberty to the petitioner to pursue an appropriate remedy against the order rejecting its claim, the writ petition stands dismissed. SURESH KUMAR 2026.07.09 17:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-8102-2026 (O&M) Page 2 of 2 5. Pending applications, if any, are disposed of accordingly. [ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA] ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE [ROHIT KAPOOR] JUDGE July 7, 2026 Ess Kay Whether speaking / reasoned : Yes / No Whether Reportable : Yes / No

SURESH KUMAR 2026.07.09 17:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document