CRWP-7774-2026 (O&M) 1 118 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-7774-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 06.07.2026 NOSAD AND ANOTHER ...PETITIONERS VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ....RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL Present: Mr. Khalid Tauru, Advocate for the petitioners. **** H.S. GREWAL, J. (ORAL) CRM-W-895-2026 This application has been filed under Section 528 of BNSS (corresponding Section 482 of Cr.P.C) for exempting the petitioners from filing the certified/typed copies of Annexures and local address proof of the petitoner. Allowed as prayed for. Main case: 1. This Criminal Writ Petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents No.2 & 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners and to save them from illegal as well as unnecessary harassment in the hands of respondents No. 4 to 8 with a further prayer to decide the representation dated 29.06.2025. RENU RAWAT 2026.07.06 17.58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh CRWP-7774-2026 (O&M) 2

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner live in No.1 has been in a relationship with petitioner No.2. The private respondents have been extending threats of dire consequences to the live in petitioners as they are averse to their relationship. While drawing the attention of this Court to representation dated 29.06.2025 (Annexure P-4), learned counsel has submitted that the matter was reported to respondent No.2- Superintendent of Police, Mewat, Haryana seeking police help but in vain. Learned counsel submits that the petitioners would be satisfied if directions are issued to respondent No.2- Superintendent of Police, Mewat, Haryana to look into the aforesaid representation and take appropriate steps at the earliest. 3. Notice of motion to respondents No.1 to 3 only. 4. At the asking of the Court, Mr. Rakesh Kumar Jangra, AAG, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of respondents No. 1 to 3.

5. In view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the live in petitioners and without commenting upon the status of relationship of the petitioners, the present petition is disposed of with directions to respondent No.2- Superintendent of Police, Mewat, Haryana to look into the aforesaid representation qua the alleged threat perception and take ne-cessary steps, as may be required, in accordance with law, to ensure that the life and liberty of the petitioners is not jeopardized at the hands of the private respondents. However, this direction will have no effect on any RENU RAWAT 2026.07.06 17.58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh CRWP-7774-2026 (O&M) 3 civil or criminal action, which could be initiated in the matter in accord-ance with law. 6. It is made clear that there is no adjudication on merits and this is not a blanket order of protection from arrest in any FIR. It is further made clear that this order shall not come in the way if the interrogation of the petitioners is required in any cognizable case. (H.S.GREWAL) 06.07.2026 JUDGE renu Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No RENU RAWAT 2026.07.06 17.58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

CRWP-7774-2026 (O&M) 1 118 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-7774-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 06.07.2026 NOSAD AND ANOTHER ...PETITIONERS VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ....RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL Present: Mr. Khalid Tauru, Advocate for the petitioners. **** H.S. GREWAL, J. (ORAL) CRM-W-895-2026 This application has been filed under Section 528 of BNSS (corresponding Section 482 of Cr.P.C) for exempting the petitioners from filing the certified/typed copies of Annexures and local address proof of the petitoner. Allowed as prayed for. Main case: 1. This Criminal Writ Petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents No.2 & 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners and to save them from illegal as well as unnecessary harassment in the hands of respondents No. 4 to 8 with a further prayer to decide the representation dated 29.06.2025. RENU RAWAT 2026.07.06 17.58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh CRWP-7774-2026 (O&M) 2

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner live in No.1 has been in a relationship with petitioner No.2. The private respondents have been extending threats of dire consequences to the live in petitioners as they are averse to their relationship. While drawing the attention of this Court to representation dated 29.06.2025 (Annexure P-4), learned counsel has submitted that the matter was reported to respondent No.2- Superintendent of Police, Mewat, Haryana seeking police help but in vain. Learned counsel submits that the petitioners would be satisfied if directions are issued to respondent No.2- Superintendent of Police, Mewat, Haryana to look into the aforesaid representation and take appropriate steps at the earliest. 3. Notice of motion to respondents No.1 to 3 only. 4. At the asking of the Court, Mr. Rakesh Kumar Jangra, AAG, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of respondents No. 1 to 3.

5. In view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the live in petitioners and without commenting upon the status of relationship of the petitioners, the present petition is disposed of with directions to respondent No.2- Superintendent of Police, Mewat, Haryana to look into the aforesaid representation qua the alleged threat perception and take ne-cessary steps, as may be required, in accordance with law, to ensure that the life and liberty of the petitioners is not jeopardized at the hands of the private respondents. However, this direction will have no effect on any RENU RAWAT 2026.07.06 17.58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh CRWP-7774-2026 (O&M) 3 civil or criminal action, which could be initiated in the matter in accord-ance with law. 6. It is made clear that there is no adjudication on merits and this is not a blanket order of protection from arrest in any FIR. It is further made clear that this order shall not come in the way if the interrogation of the petitioners is required in any cognizable case. (H.S.GREWAL) 06.07.2026 JUDGE renu Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No RENU RAWAT 2026.07.06 17.58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh