106 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh Criminal Misc. No. M-28912 of 2026 Date of Decision: 03.07.2026 Sukhdev Singh alias Teji ... Petitioner(s) Versus State of Punjab ... Respondent(s) CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Surya Partap Singh. Present: Mr. Vedant Setia, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. Eklavya Darshi, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, for the respondent. Surya Partap Singh, J. 1. This petition for anticipatory bail is the first petition filed by the petitioner under Section 482 of ‘the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023’. It has been filed with regard to a case arising out of FIR No.289 dated 08.11.2025, for the commission of offence punishable under Section(s) 115(2), 118(1), 351(3), 191(3) & 190 [Sections 117(2) & 118(2) were added later on] of ‘the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023’/’the Indian Penal Code, 1860’ Police Station Lambi, District Sri Muktsar Sahib, Punjab. 2. Vide order dated 20.05.2026, the petitioner was admitted to interim anticipatory bail, subject to the condition of furnishing bonds to the satisfaction of arresting officer. It was also directed that the petitioner shall join the investigation. 3. Heard. DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2026.07.04 12:02 I attest to the accuracy and4. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner thatintegrity of this document Criminal Misc. No. M-28912 of 2026 2

in compliance with order dated 20.05.2026, the petitioner has already joined the investigation, and that nothing has been left to be recovered from the possession of petitioner. In view of above, the learned counsel for the petitioner has requested that the order dated 20.05.2026 be made absolute. 5. The learned State counsel, on the instructions of ‘ASI Gurdeep Singh’, has submitted that the petitioner has joined investigation, and that for further investigation of this case his custodial interrogation is not required. 6. The record has been perused carefully. 7. Keeping in view the aforesaid submissions and the fact that the petitioner has already joined the investigation, it is hereby ordered that the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail. Hence, the present petition is hereby allowed and the order dated 20.05.2026, whereby the petitioner was accorded the benefit of interim anticipatory bail, is hereby made absolute. (Surya Partap Singh) Judge July 03, 2026 “DK” Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2026.07.04 12:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

106 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh Criminal Misc. No. M-28912 of 2026 Date of Decision: 03.07.2026 Sukhdev Singh alias Teji ... Petitioner(s) Versus State of Punjab ... Respondent(s) CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Surya Partap Singh. Present: Mr. Vedant Setia, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. Eklavya Darshi, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, for the respondent. Surya Partap Singh, J. 1. This petition for anticipatory bail is the first petition filed by the petitioner under Section 482 of ‘the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023’. It has been filed with regard to a case arising out of FIR No.289 dated 08.11.2025, for the commission of offence punishable under Section(s) 115(2), 118(1), 351(3), 191(3) & 190 [Sections 117(2) & 118(2) were added later on] of ‘the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023’/’the Indian Penal Code, 1860’ Police Station Lambi, District Sri Muktsar Sahib, Punjab. 2. Vide order dated 20.05.2026, the petitioner was admitted to interim anticipatory bail, subject to the condition of furnishing bonds to the satisfaction of arresting officer. It was also directed that the petitioner shall join the investigation. 3. Heard. DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2026.07.04 12:02 I attest to the accuracy and4. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner thatintegrity of this document Criminal Misc. No. M-28912 of 2026 2

in compliance with order dated 20.05.2026, the petitioner has already joined the investigation, and that nothing has been left to be recovered from the possession of petitioner. In view of above, the learned counsel for the petitioner has requested that the order dated 20.05.2026 be made absolute. 5. The learned State counsel, on the instructions of ‘ASI Gurdeep Singh’, has submitted that the petitioner has joined investigation, and that for further investigation of this case his custodial interrogation is not required. 6. The record has been perused carefully. 7. Keeping in view the aforesaid submissions and the fact that the petitioner has already joined the investigation, it is hereby ordered that the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail. Hence, the present petition is hereby allowed and the order dated 20.05.2026, whereby the petitioner was accorded the benefit of interim anticipatory bail, is hereby made absolute. (Surya Partap Singh) Judge July 03, 2026 “DK” Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2026.07.04 12:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document