210 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH *** CWP-35375-2025 Date of decision : 01.07.2026 Sangeeta Sayal ... Petitioner Versus State Bank of India and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present: Mr. Sachin Jain, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms.Shifa Arora, Advocate for respondent no.1 (through V.C.). Mr. Rajesh K. Sheoran, Advocate and Mr.Hardeep Singh Poonia, Advocate for respondent no.3. Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, Advocate for respondent no.4. VIKAS BAHL, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a Civil Writ Petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking urgent interim protection by restraining respondent no.1 from allowing withdrawal or transfer of funds from fixed deposits, standing in the name of Late Shri Brijinder Kumar Khosla. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that since civil suit is pending, he be permitted to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to raise all pleas which are available to the petitioner in the said suit. 3. In view of the above, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. (VIKAS BAHL) JUDGE (SUBHAS MEHLA) JUDGE July 01, 2026. Davinder Kumar Whether speaking / reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No DAVINDER KUMAR 2026.07.01 16:53 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order / judgment

210 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH *** CWP-35375-2025 Date of decision : 01.07.2026 Sangeeta Sayal ... Petitioner Versus State Bank of India and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present: Mr. Sachin Jain, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms.Shifa Arora, Advocate for respondent no.1 (through V.C.). Mr. Rajesh K. Sheoran, Advocate and Mr.Hardeep Singh Poonia, Advocate for respondent no.3. Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, Advocate for respondent no.4. VIKAS BAHL, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a Civil Writ Petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking urgent interim protection by restraining respondent no.1 from allowing withdrawal or transfer of funds from fixed deposits, standing in the name of Late Shri Brijinder Kumar Khosla. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that since civil suit is pending, he be permitted to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to raise all pleas which are available to the petitioner in the said suit. 3. In view of the above, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. (VIKAS BAHL) JUDGE (SUBHAS MEHLA) JUDGE July 01, 2026. Davinder Kumar Whether speaking / reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No DAVINDER KUMAR 2026.07.01 16:53 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order / judgment