-1- CWP-18725-2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH *** 136 & 137 Date of Decision: 01.07.2026 1. CWP-18725-2026 NAANAGI SINCE DECEASED THROUGH HER LRS & OTHERS …Petitioners Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS …Respondents And 2. CWP-18726-2026 SNEH LATA ALIAS SNEHLATA …Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present:- Mr. Tanmoy Gupta, Advocate for petitioners Mr. Priyavrat Parashar, AAG, Haryana *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1. As common issues are involved in the captioned petitions, with the consent of both sides, the same are hereby disposed of by this common order. For the sake of brevity and convenience, facts are borrowed from CWP-18725-2026. 2. The petitioner through instant petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking setting aside of award dated 27.02.2026 SUDEEPAK KUMAR 2026.07.01 17:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document -2- CWP-18725-2026 whereby respondent No.4-NHAI has dismissed petition dated 11.12.2017 for enhancement of compensation. She is also seeking direction to respondents to grant solatium along with interest from the date of notification till realization. 3. Learned counsel for petitioners seeks permission to withdraw with liberty to approach learned District Judge in terms of Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. 4. Disposed of as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.

5. The Court is sanguine that if petitioners approach learned District Judge, their petitions would be adjudicated expeditiously. 6. Pending Misc. application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 01.07.2026 SDK Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No SUDEEPAK KUMAR 2026.07.01 17:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

-1- CWP-18725-2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH *** 136 & 137 Date of Decision: 01.07.2026 1. CWP-18725-2026 NAANAGI SINCE DECEASED THROUGH HER LRS & OTHERS …Petitioners Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS …Respondents And 2. CWP-18726-2026 SNEH LATA ALIAS SNEHLATA …Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present:- Mr. Tanmoy Gupta, Advocate for petitioners Mr. Priyavrat Parashar, AAG, Haryana *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1. As common issues are involved in the captioned petitions, with the consent of both sides, the same are hereby disposed of by this common order. For the sake of brevity and convenience, facts are borrowed from CWP-18725-2026. 2. The petitioner through instant petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking setting aside of award dated 27.02.2026 SUDEEPAK KUMAR 2026.07.01 17:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document -2- CWP-18725-2026 whereby respondent No.4-NHAI has dismissed petition dated 11.12.2017 for enhancement of compensation. She is also seeking direction to respondents to grant solatium along with interest from the date of notification till realization. 3. Learned counsel for petitioners seeks permission to withdraw with liberty to approach learned District Judge in terms of Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. 4. Disposed of as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.

5. The Court is sanguine that if petitioners approach learned District Judge, their petitions would be adjudicated expeditiously. 6. Pending Misc. application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 01.07.2026 SDK Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No SUDEEPAK KUMAR 2026.07.01 17:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document