103 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh Criminal Misc. No. M-27946 of 2026 Date of Decision: 01.07.2026 Shree Ram ... Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana ... Respondent(s) CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Surya Partap Singh. Present: Mr. Ravinder Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. Ramender Singh Chauhan, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana, for the respondent. Surya Partap Singh, J. 1. This petition for anticipatory bail is the first petition filed by the petitioner under Section 482 of ‘the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023’. It has been filed with regard to a case arising out of FIR No.169 dated 18.04.2026, for the commission of offence punishable under Section(s) 303 of ‘the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023’, Police Station Shahbad, District Kurukshetra, Haryana. 2. Vide order dated 18.05.2026, the petitioner was admitted to interim anticipatory bail, subject to the condition of furnishing bonds to the satisfaction of arresting officer. It was also directed that the petitioner shall join the investigation. 3. The learned State Counsel has filed reply. The same be taken on record. DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2026.07.01 19:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Criminal Misc. No. M-27946 of 2026 2 4. Heard.

5. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that in compliance with order dated 18.05.2026, the petitioner has already joined the investigation, and that nothing has been left to be recovered from the possession of petitioner. In view of above, the learned counsel for the petitioner has requested that the order dated 18.05.2026 be made absolute. 6. The learned State counsel, on the instructions of ‘SI Rajender Singh’, has submitted that the petitioner has joined investigation, and that for further investigation of this case his custodial interrogation is not required. 7. The record has been perused carefully. 8. Keeping in view the aforesaid submissions and the fact that the petitioner has already joined the investigation, it is hereby ordered that the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail. Hence, the present petition is hereby allowed and the order dated 18.05.2026, whereby the petitioner was accorded the benefit of interim anticipatory bail, is hereby made absolute. (Surya Partap Singh) Judge July 01, 2026 “DK” Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2026.07.01 19:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

103 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh Criminal Misc. No. M-27946 of 2026 Date of Decision: 01.07.2026 Shree Ram ... Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana ... Respondent(s) CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Surya Partap Singh. Present: Mr. Ravinder Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. Ramender Singh Chauhan, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana, for the respondent. Surya Partap Singh, J. 1. This petition for anticipatory bail is the first petition filed by the petitioner under Section 482 of ‘the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023’. It has been filed with regard to a case arising out of FIR No.169 dated 18.04.2026, for the commission of offence punishable under Section(s) 303 of ‘the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023’, Police Station Shahbad, District Kurukshetra, Haryana. 2. Vide order dated 18.05.2026, the petitioner was admitted to interim anticipatory bail, subject to the condition of furnishing bonds to the satisfaction of arresting officer. It was also directed that the petitioner shall join the investigation. 3. The learned State Counsel has filed reply. The same be taken on record. DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2026.07.01 19:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Criminal Misc. No. M-27946 of 2026 2 4. Heard.

5. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that in compliance with order dated 18.05.2026, the petitioner has already joined the investigation, and that nothing has been left to be recovered from the possession of petitioner. In view of above, the learned counsel for the petitioner has requested that the order dated 18.05.2026 be made absolute. 6. The learned State counsel, on the instructions of ‘SI Rajender Singh’, has submitted that the petitioner has joined investigation, and that for further investigation of this case his custodial interrogation is not required. 7. The record has been perused carefully. 8. Keeping in view the aforesaid submissions and the fact that the petitioner has already joined the investigation, it is hereby ordered that the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail. Hence, the present petition is hereby allowed and the order dated 18.05.2026, whereby the petitioner was accorded the benefit of interim anticipatory bail, is hereby made absolute. (Surya Partap Singh) Judge July 01, 2026 “DK” Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2026.07.01 19:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document