109 IN THE HIGH COURT OFF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHAANDIGARH CWWP-19518-2026 Da te of Decision : 30.06.2026 JAYATI ARYA ........Petitioner VERSUUS CANARAA BANK AND OTHERS ........Respondent(s) CORAMM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HHARSIMRAN SINGH SETHII Present: Mr. Shantanu Bansal, Advoccate for the petitioner. Mr. Gaurav Goel, Advocate ffor the respondent-Bank. (joined through V.C.). HARSIMMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Orall) 1. In the present civil writ petitioon, challenge is to the transfer orrder dated 02.005.2026 (Annexure P-7) wherebyy, the petitioner has been transferrred from Gwwalior Regional Office, Bhopal Circle Office to Chennai Noorth Regional OOffice, Chennai Circle Office. 2. Learned counsel for the petittioner was requested to address this Court as tto how this Court has the jurisdicction to consider the present petittion keeping inn view the aforesaid situation aas the impugned order was passsed outside th e jurisdiction of this Court, learneed counsel for the petitioner submmits that the prresent petition may kindly be dissposed of as not pressed any furtther with libertty to approach the appropriate Co urt having the requisite jurisdictioon. 3. Ordered accordingly. 30-06-20226 ((HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) Sapna Goyal JUDGE NOTE: Whether speaking/ rreasoned: YES Whether reportable: NO SAPNA GOYAL 2026.06.30 16:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

109 IN THE HIGH COURT OFF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHAANDIGARH CWWP-19518-2026 Da te of Decision : 30.06.2026 JAYATI ARYA ........Petitioner VERSUUS CANARAA BANK AND OTHERS ........Respondent(s) CORAMM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HHARSIMRAN SINGH SETHII Present: Mr. Shantanu Bansal, Advoccate for the petitioner. Mr. Gaurav Goel, Advocate ffor the respondent-Bank. (joined through V.C.). HARSIMMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Orall) 1. In the present civil writ petitioon, challenge is to the transfer orrder dated 02.005.2026 (Annexure P-7) wherebyy, the petitioner has been transferrred from Gwwalior Regional Office, Bhopal Circle Office to Chennai Noorth Regional OOffice, Chennai Circle Office. 2. Learned counsel for the petittioner was requested to address this Court as tto how this Court has the jurisdicction to consider the present petittion keeping inn view the aforesaid situation aas the impugned order was passsed outside th e jurisdiction of this Court, learneed counsel for the petitioner submmits that the prresent petition may kindly be dissposed of as not pressed any furtther with libertty to approach the appropriate Co urt having the requisite jurisdictioon. 3. Ordered accordingly. 30-06-20226 ((HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) Sapna Goyal JUDGE NOTE: Whether speaking/ rreasoned: YES Whether reportable: NO SAPNA GOYAL 2026.06.30 16:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document