IN THE HHIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AAND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 115 CRWP Noo.7445 of 2026 Date of deecision: 24.06.2026 SANJNA RANI AND ANOTHER …. Petitioners Versus STATE OOF PUNJAB AND OTHERS …. Respondents CORAM:: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMARI Present : Mr. Karandeep Singh, Advoccate for the petitioners. Ms. Jagriti Kalia, Assistant AAdvocate General, Punjab. **** RAMESHH KUMARI, J. (oral) 1. The presennt petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitutionn of India sseeking issuance of a writ of mmandamus directing the officiall respondennts No.2 and 3 to protect the lifee and liberty of the petitioners att the handss of respondents No. 4 to 8 and to take action on theirr representaation dated 20.06.2026 (Annexurre P-6). 2. At the verry outset, learned counsel for thhe petitioners has submitted thatt the petitiooners have recently filed a repreesentation on 20.06.2026 beforee the Seniorr Superintendent of Police, Faazilka, Punjab (Annexure P-6)) raising theeir grievances as mentioned in thhe present petition but the samee has not yeet been considered and no acti on has been taken thereon. Hee further subbmitted that at this stage, the ppetitioners would be satisfied iff appropriatte directions are issued to respondent No.2-Seniorr JYOTI 2026.06.25 09:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWWP No.7445 of 2026 -2-

Superintenndent of Police, Fazilka, Punnjab to decide the aforesaidd representaation filed by the petitioners and ttake necessary action thereon. 3. Notice of mmotion. 4. Ms. Jagritti Kalia, Assistant Advocate Genneral, Punjab, who is present inn Court, hass accepted the notice on behallf of the respondents-State andd submits thhat the needful will be done in duue course. Let a complete set off the paperbbook be supplied to her during thhe course of the day. 5. In view of the limited prayer madee by the petitioners, withoutt commentinng anything on the merits of tthe case, the present petition iss disposed oof at this stage with a direction too respondent No. 2 to decide thee aforesaid representation dated 20.06.22026 (Annexure P-6) of thee petitionerss within a period of 15 days fro m today, by passing a speakingg order in acccordance with law. Needless to say, if any threat is found to thee petitionerss, the official respondents wouldd provide them adequate securityy in order too protect their life and liberty. (RAMESH KUMARI) 24.06.2026 JUDGE Jyoti-IV Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No. Whether reportable : Yes/No JYOTI 2026.06.25 09:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

IN THE HHIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AAND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 115 CRWP Noo.7445 of 2026 Date of deecision: 24.06.2026 SANJNA RANI AND ANOTHER …. Petitioners Versus STATE OOF PUNJAB AND OTHERS …. Respondents CORAM:: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMARI Present : Mr. Karandeep Singh, Advoccate for the petitioners. Ms. Jagriti Kalia, Assistant AAdvocate General, Punjab. **** RAMESHH KUMARI, J. (oral) 1. The presennt petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitutionn of India sseeking issuance of a writ of mmandamus directing the officiall respondennts No.2 and 3 to protect the lifee and liberty of the petitioners att the handss of respondents No. 4 to 8 and to take action on theirr representaation dated 20.06.2026 (Annexurre P-6). 2. At the verry outset, learned counsel for thhe petitioners has submitted thatt the petitiooners have recently filed a repreesentation on 20.06.2026 beforee the Seniorr Superintendent of Police, Faazilka, Punjab (Annexure P-6)) raising theeir grievances as mentioned in thhe present petition but the samee has not yeet been considered and no acti on has been taken thereon. Hee further subbmitted that at this stage, the ppetitioners would be satisfied iff appropriatte directions are issued to respondent No.2-Seniorr JYOTI 2026.06.25 09:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWWP No.7445 of 2026 -2-

Superintenndent of Police, Fazilka, Punnjab to decide the aforesaidd representaation filed by the petitioners and ttake necessary action thereon. 3. Notice of mmotion. 4. Ms. Jagritti Kalia, Assistant Advocate Genneral, Punjab, who is present inn Court, hass accepted the notice on behallf of the respondents-State andd submits thhat the needful will be done in duue course. Let a complete set off the paperbbook be supplied to her during thhe course of the day. 5. In view of the limited prayer madee by the petitioners, withoutt commentinng anything on the merits of tthe case, the present petition iss disposed oof at this stage with a direction too respondent No. 2 to decide thee aforesaid representation dated 20.06.22026 (Annexure P-6) of thee petitionerss within a period of 15 days fro m today, by passing a speakingg order in acccordance with law. Needless to say, if any threat is found to thee petitionerss, the official respondents wouldd provide them adequate securityy in order too protect their life and liberty. (RAMESH KUMARI) 24.06.2026 JUDGE Jyoti-IV Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No. Whether reportable : Yes/No JYOTI 2026.06.25 09:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document