IN THHE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARHH 117 CRM-M-334101-2026(O&M) Date of deecision: 17.06.2026 Kulwinder Singhh ...Petitioner(s) VERSUS State of Punjab ...Respondent(s) CORAM : HOON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOOD S. BHARDWAJ Present :- Mr.. Simranjeet S. Sarwara, Advocaate for the petitioner. Mr.. Mohit Kapoor, Sr.DAG, Punjabb. Mr.. Arun Luthra, Advocate (througgh VC) for the complainant. ***** VINOD S. BHAARDWAJ, J. (Oral) Thee present petition has been fileed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeeking anticipatory bail to the petitioner in caase bearing FIR No.85 dated 004.05.2026 registered under Sections 420, 1120-B Indian Penal Code, 18660 at Police Station Sadar, District Patiala. 2. Aft er arguing the matter at somme length, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner contendds that due to inadvertence, translated copy of the FIR could not be attacheed. He thus seeks withdrawal of the present ppetition so as to file a fresh peetition on the same cause of action after givinng complete particulars. 3. In vview of the above, the presennt petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. 4. Pennding application(s), if any, shalll also stand disposed of. (VINNOD S. BHARDWAJ) 17.06.2026 JUDGE Sumit Gusain Whether sppeaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether repportable : Yes/No SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2026.06.17 14:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

IN THHE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARHH 117 CRM-M-334101-2026(O&M) Date of deecision: 17.06.2026 Kulwinder Singhh ...Petitioner(s) VERSUS State of Punjab ...Respondent(s) CORAM : HOON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOOD S. BHARDWAJ Present :- Mr.. Simranjeet S. Sarwara, Advocaate for the petitioner. Mr.. Mohit Kapoor, Sr.DAG, Punjabb. Mr.. Arun Luthra, Advocate (througgh VC) for the complainant. ***** VINOD S. BHAARDWAJ, J. (Oral) Thee present petition has been fileed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeeking anticipatory bail to the petitioner in caase bearing FIR No.85 dated 004.05.2026 registered under Sections 420, 1120-B Indian Penal Code, 18660 at Police Station Sadar, District Patiala. 2. Aft er arguing the matter at somme length, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner contendds that due to inadvertence, translated copy of the FIR could not be attacheed. He thus seeks withdrawal of the present ppetition so as to file a fresh peetition on the same cause of action after givinng complete particulars. 3. In vview of the above, the presennt petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. 4. Pennding application(s), if any, shalll also stand disposed of. (VINNOD S. BHARDWAJ) 17.06.2026 JUDGE Sumit Gusain Whether sppeaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether repportable : Yes/No SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2026.06.17 14:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document