IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** 221 CRM-M-33273-2023 Date of Decision.:15.06.2026 Gurjit Singh @ Happy …..Pe22oner Vs. State of Punjab .….Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present:- Mr. Dilraj Singh Bhinder, Advocate for the pe oner. **** DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The pe oner is seeking regular bail by way of pe on filed under Sec on 439 Cr.P.C in case FIR No.217 dated 28.11.2025 registered under Sec ons 109, 124(1), 132, 121(1), 115(2), 118(1), 326(G), 125(A), 126(2), 221, 226, 190, 191(3), 195(1), 285, 287, 288, 324(3), 351(3), 62, 57 of BNS, 2023 (Corresponding Sec ons 307, 326(A), 353, 332, 323, 324, 436, 337, 341, 186, 149, 148, 152, 283, 285, 286, 506, 511, 117 of IPC, 1860) and Sec ons 4 and 5 of The Punjab Preven on Of Damage To Public And Private Property Act at Police Sta on City Sangrur, District Sangrur. 2. As the present file would reveal that pe oner along with co-accused is alleged to have caused injuries to Inspector Jasvir Singh on 28.11.2025. One of the assailants even poured petrol upon the complainant and caused injuries. However the said act of pouring petrol on Inspector Jasvir Singh is a<ributed only to the co-accused Sukhjinder Singh @ Seepa. 3. Learned counsel submits that pe oner has been falsely implicated and that he is in custody since 28.11.2025 and that no specific injury is a<ributed to him and so, he be allowed bail. NEETIKA TUTEJA 2026.06.15 17:18 I attest to the accuracy and

integrity of this document CRM-M-33273-2023 4. No ce of mo on. 5. Mr. Ravneet Singh Joshi, DAG, Punjab accepts no ce on behalf of respondent- State. 6. Learned State counsel concedes the fact that injury by pouring petrol on the complainant is a<ributed only to Sukhjinder Singh @ Seepa. However it is informed that s cks and bo<les etc. were recovered from the pe oner and others. It is further informed that five injuries were found to have been caused to the complainant but all of them were found to be simple. Learned State counsel further informs that challan has already been filed on 03.12.2025 a?er conclusion of inves ga on. 7. Heard. 8. Pe oner is in custody for the last more than 06 months. No specific injury is a<ributed to him. Five injuries found on the person of the complainant are stated to be simple in nature. Challan has already been filed. Trial may take long me to conclude. 9. Having regard to the above facts and circumstances, but without commen ng anything further on the merits of the case, this pe on is allowed and pe oner is admi<ed to bail on his furnishing bail bonds/surety bonds to the sa sfac on of the Learned Trial Court/Duty Magistrate concerned, on usual terms and condi ons. ( DEEPAK GUPTA ) JUDGE June 15, 2024 Nee ka Tuteja Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No NEETIKA TUTEJA 2026.06.15 17:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** 221 CRM-M-33273-2023 Date of Decision.:15.06.2026 Gurjit Singh @ Happy …..Pe22oner Vs. State of Punjab .….Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present:- Mr. Dilraj Singh Bhinder, Advocate for the pe oner. **** DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The pe oner is seeking regular bail by way of pe on filed under Sec on 439 Cr.P.C in case FIR No.217 dated 28.11.2025 registered under Sec ons 109, 124(1), 132, 121(1), 115(2), 118(1), 326(G), 125(A), 126(2), 221, 226, 190, 191(3), 195(1), 285, 287, 288, 324(3), 351(3), 62, 57 of BNS, 2023 (Corresponding Sec ons 307, 326(A), 353, 332, 323, 324, 436, 337, 341, 186, 149, 148, 152, 283, 285, 286, 506, 511, 117 of IPC, 1860) and Sec ons 4 and 5 of The Punjab Preven on Of Damage To Public And Private Property Act at Police Sta on City Sangrur, District Sangrur. 2. As the present file would reveal that pe oner along with co-accused is alleged to have caused injuries to Inspector Jasvir Singh on 28.11.2025. One of the assailants even poured petrol upon the complainant and caused injuries. However the said act of pouring petrol on Inspector Jasvir Singh is a<ributed only to the co-accused Sukhjinder Singh @ Seepa. 3. Learned counsel submits that pe oner has been falsely implicated and that he is in custody since 28.11.2025 and that no specific injury is a<ributed to him and so, he be allowed bail. NEETIKA TUTEJA 2026.06.15 17:18 I attest to the accuracy and

integrity of this document CRM-M-33273-2023 4. No ce of mo on. 5. Mr. Ravneet Singh Joshi, DAG, Punjab accepts no ce on behalf of respondent- State. 6. Learned State counsel concedes the fact that injury by pouring petrol on the complainant is a<ributed only to Sukhjinder Singh @ Seepa. However it is informed that s cks and bo<les etc. were recovered from the pe oner and others. It is further informed that five injuries were found to have been caused to the complainant but all of them were found to be simple. Learned State counsel further informs that challan has already been filed on 03.12.2025 a?er conclusion of inves ga on. 7. Heard. 8. Pe oner is in custody for the last more than 06 months. No specific injury is a<ributed to him. Five injuries found on the person of the complainant are stated to be simple in nature. Challan has already been filed. Trial may take long me to conclude. 9. Having regard to the above facts and circumstances, but without commen ng anything further on the merits of the case, this pe on is allowed and pe oner is admi<ed to bail on his furnishing bail bonds/surety bonds to the sa sfac on of the Learned Trial Court/Duty Magistrate concerned, on usual terms and condi ons. ( DEEPAK GUPTA ) JUDGE June 15, 2024 Nee ka Tuteja Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No NEETIKA TUTEJA 2026.06.15 17:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document