IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** 123 CRM-M-33816-2026 Date of Decision:12.06.2026 Jagtar Singh …..Pe,,oner Vs. State of Punjab .….Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present:- Ms. Shivek Thakur, Advocate for the pe oner. **** DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL) A er arguing for some me, when this Court is not inclined to grant any relief, learned counsel for the pe oner has made a statement, so as to withdraw the pe on. In view of the aforesaid statement made by learned counsel for the pe oner, present pe on is hereby dismissed as withdrawn, as prayed for. (DEEPAK GUPTA) JUDGE June 12, 2026 Nee ka Tuteja Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No NEETIKA TUTEJA 2026.06.12 16:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** 123 CRM-M-33816-2026 Date of Decision:12.06.2026 Jagtar Singh …..Pe,,oner Vs. State of Punjab .….Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present:- Ms. Shivek Thakur, Advocate for the pe oner. **** DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL) A er arguing for some me, when this Court is not inclined to grant any relief, learned counsel for the pe oner has made a statement, so as to withdraw the pe on. In view of the aforesaid statement made by learned counsel for the pe oner, present pe on is hereby dismissed as withdrawn, as prayed for. (DEEPAK GUPTA) JUDGE June 12, 2026 Nee ka Tuteja Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No NEETIKA TUTEJA 2026.06.12 16:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document