CRWP-6407-22026 (O&M) (1) IN THE HHIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AAND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ( 120) CRRWP-6407-2026 (O&M) D ate of decision : 29.05.2026 KAJAL AND ANOTHER ... Petitioners Versus STATE OF PUUNJAB AND OTHERS ...Respondents CORAM: HOON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANNISHA BATRA Present: Mrr. R.K. Kachura, Advocate for thhe petitioners Mss. Ruchika Sabherwal, Senior DAAG, Punjab **** MANISHA BAATRA, J. (ORAL) 1. Thhe present petition has been fileed under Article 226/227 of the Constitutionn of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the official resppondents No.2 and 3 to protectt the life and liberty of the petitioners at thhe hands of respondents No.4 too 12 and take action on their representation ddated 26.05.2026 (Annexure P-3 ). 2. It is submitted by the learned couunsel for the petitioners that they are major. They are in love. Their parents are against their relationship and threats havve even been extended to petitionner No.1 by her parents and relatives to killl her. She has left her house andd has started living with the petitioner No.2 . Apprehending danger to theirr lives and liberty, they sent representation ddated 26.05.2026 to the responddent No.2 but the same has not been taken iinto consideration and hence, thee present petition. AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.29 15:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRWP-6407-22026 (O&M) (2) 3. Nootice of motion.

4. Mss. Ruchika Sabherwal, Sr. DAGG, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of respoondents No.1 to 3, at this stage.. The petitioners’ counsel is directed to suppply the copy of the petition to herr. 5. I have heard learned counsel forr the petitioners as well as learned State ccounsel and without going into the question of legality of their relationship as well as without entering uupon an exercise to evaluate the veracity of the averments made in the petittion and also with regard to the sanctity of rrelationship or age of the petitionners, this petition is disposed of with a directtion to the respondent No.2-Seniior Superintendent of Police, Ferozepur to loook into the matter and dispose of the representation dated 26.05.2026 (Annnexure P-3) in accordance wwith law and also to take necessary step, if any, genuine threat to life andd liberty of the petitioners is found. 6. It is made clear that this order shaall not be taken to protect the petitioners fromm legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by them. (MMANISHA BATRA) JUDGE 29.05.2026 Whether speaking/reasoned:- YYes/No Amit Sharma Whether reportable:- Yes/No AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.29 15:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.

CRWP-6407-22026 (O&M) (1) IN THE HHIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AAND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ( 120) CRRWP-6407-2026 (O&M) D ate of decision : 29.05.2026 KAJAL AND ANOTHER ... Petitioners Versus STATE OF PUUNJAB AND OTHERS ...Respondents CORAM: HOON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANNISHA BATRA Present: Mrr. R.K. Kachura, Advocate for thhe petitioners Mss. Ruchika Sabherwal, Senior DAAG, Punjab **** MANISHA BAATRA, J. (ORAL) 1. Thhe present petition has been fileed under Article 226/227 of the Constitutionn of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the official resppondents No.2 and 3 to protectt the life and liberty of the petitioners at thhe hands of respondents No.4 too 12 and take action on their representation ddated 26.05.2026 (Annexure P-3 ). 2. It is submitted by the learned couunsel for the petitioners that they are major. They are in love. Their parents are against their relationship and threats havve even been extended to petitionner No.1 by her parents and relatives to killl her. She has left her house andd has started living with the petitioner No.2 . Apprehending danger to theirr lives and liberty, they sent representation ddated 26.05.2026 to the responddent No.2 but the same has not been taken iinto consideration and hence, thee present petition. AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.29 15:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRWP-6407-22026 (O&M) (2) 3. Nootice of motion.

4. Mss. Ruchika Sabherwal, Sr. DAGG, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of respoondents No.1 to 3, at this stage.. The petitioners’ counsel is directed to suppply the copy of the petition to herr. 5. I have heard learned counsel forr the petitioners as well as learned State ccounsel and without going into the question of legality of their relationship as well as without entering uupon an exercise to evaluate the veracity of the averments made in the petittion and also with regard to the sanctity of rrelationship or age of the petitionners, this petition is disposed of with a directtion to the respondent No.2-Seniior Superintendent of Police, Ferozepur to loook into the matter and dispose of the representation dated 26.05.2026 (Annnexure P-3) in accordance wwith law and also to take necessary step, if any, genuine threat to life andd liberty of the petitioners is found. 6. It is made clear that this order shaall not be taken to protect the petitioners fromm legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by them. (MMANISHA BATRA) JUDGE 29.05.2026 Whether speaking/reasoned:- YYes/No Amit Sharma Whether reportable:- Yes/No AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.29 15:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.