IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 109 CWP-37338-2025 (O & M) Date of Decision:29.05.2026 M/S RATTAN LAL PERIWAL AND SONS ...PETITIONER VERSUS AUTHORIZED OFFICER, PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK & ANR. ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI Present: Mr. Akhilesh Vyas, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. C.S. Pasricha, Advocate (through VC) and Ms. Kirti Kanwar, Advocate, for the respondent-Bank. SUVIR SEHGAL, J.(ORAL) CM-9465-CWP-2026 1. Prayer in this application is for preponement and withdrawal of the main case. 2. For the reasons given in the application, it is allowed. 3. Date of hearing of the main case is preponed to today and is ordered to be taken on Board. Main Case 1. At the outset, Mr. Akhilesh Vyas, counsel for the petitioner seeks and is granted permission to withdraw the writ petition as according to him, an application for OTS submitted by petitioner has been accepted by the respondents. 2. Dismissed as withdrawn. (SUVIR SEHGAL) JUDGE 29.05.2026 (VIKAS SURI) sheetal JUDGE Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No SHEETAL 2026.05.30 13:58 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment High Court, Chandigarh

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 109 CWP-37338-2025 (O & M) Date of Decision:29.05.2026 M/S RATTAN LAL PERIWAL AND SONS ...PETITIONER VERSUS AUTHORIZED OFFICER, PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK & ANR. ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI Present: Mr. Akhilesh Vyas, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. C.S. Pasricha, Advocate (through VC) and Ms. Kirti Kanwar, Advocate, for the respondent-Bank. SUVIR SEHGAL, J.(ORAL) CM-9465-CWP-2026 1. Prayer in this application is for preponement and withdrawal of the main case. 2. For the reasons given in the application, it is allowed. 3. Date of hearing of the main case is preponed to today and is ordered to be taken on Board. Main Case 1. At the outset, Mr. Akhilesh Vyas, counsel for the petitioner seeks and is granted permission to withdraw the writ petition as according to him, an application for OTS submitted by petitioner has been accepted by the respondents. 2. Dismissed as withdrawn. (SUVIR SEHGAL) JUDGE 29.05.2026 (VIKAS SURI) sheetal JUDGE Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No SHEETAL 2026.05.30 13:58 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment High Court, Chandigarh