138 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-18108-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision : 29.05.2026 SATISH KUMAR AND ORS …. Petitioners VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS …. Respondents CORAM : HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI Present : Mr. Ramesh Sindhar, Advocate and Mr. Aniket Sindhar, Advocate for the petitioners. ALKA SARIN, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners’ states that the petitioners would be satisfied if their possession is protected till such time the application for stay (Annexure P-6) filed along with the revision petition (Annexure P-5) before respondent No.1 - Financial Commissioner is decided. 2. Notice of motion to respondent Nos.1 to 4-State only. 3. Mr. Saurabh Mago, DAG Haryana accepts notice on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 4-State only. Learned counsel states that the application for stay (Annexure P-6) would be decided in a time bound manner. 4. In view of the above and without commenting on the merits of the case, the present writ petition is disposed off with a direction to respondent No.1 - Financial Commissioner to decide the application for stay (Annexure P-6), which is now pending for 08.07.2026, expeditiously and preferably within a period of two months from today. AMAN JAIN 2026.05.30 16:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment CWP-18108-2026 (O&M) -2-

5. Till such time as the application for stay (Annexure P-6) is not decided, the dispossession of the petitioners shall remain stayed. 6. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed off. (ALKA SARIN) JUDGE (RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI) 29.05.2026 JUDGE Aman Jain NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: Yes/No AMAN JAIN 2026.05.30 16:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment

138 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-18108-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision : 29.05.2026 SATISH KUMAR AND ORS …. Petitioners VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS …. Respondents CORAM : HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI Present : Mr. Ramesh Sindhar, Advocate and Mr. Aniket Sindhar, Advocate for the petitioners. ALKA SARIN, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners’ states that the petitioners would be satisfied if their possession is protected till such time the application for stay (Annexure P-6) filed along with the revision petition (Annexure P-5) before respondent No.1 - Financial Commissioner is decided. 2. Notice of motion to respondent Nos.1 to 4-State only. 3. Mr. Saurabh Mago, DAG Haryana accepts notice on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 4-State only. Learned counsel states that the application for stay (Annexure P-6) would be decided in a time bound manner. 4. In view of the above and without commenting on the merits of the case, the present writ petition is disposed off with a direction to respondent No.1 - Financial Commissioner to decide the application for stay (Annexure P-6), which is now pending for 08.07.2026, expeditiously and preferably within a period of two months from today. AMAN JAIN 2026.05.30 16:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment CWP-18108-2026 (O&M) -2-

5. Till such time as the application for stay (Annexure P-6) is not decided, the dispossession of the petitioners shall remain stayed. 6. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed off. (ALKA SARIN) JUDGE (RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI) 29.05.2026 JUDGE Aman Jain NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: Yes/No AMAN JAIN 2026.05.30 16:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment