HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** 128 CWP-13759-2026 Decided on 29.05.2026 **** Sunita Devi & Ors. ... Petitioners VS. Mission Director-NHM, Haryana & Ors. ... Respondents **** CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL **** Present: Mr. Ravinder Singh Dhull, Advocate for petitioners Mr. Deepak Balyan, Addl. AG Haryana Mr. Arvind Seth, Sr. Panel Counsel, UOI **** Sandeep Moudgil, J. (1). The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuing a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to regularize the services of the petitioners on their respective posts from the date of their initial appointment with all consequential benefits in view of the order dated 18.04.2026 passed by this Court in a bunch of similar writ petitions including in CWP-35408-2025 (Neeraj Rani & Ors. vs. State of Haryana & Ors.). (2). Learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned State counsel are ad idem and do not dispute the fact that the case of the petitioners is squarely covered by the dictum of this Court rendered in Neeraj Rani & Ors. case (supra). (3). Accordingly, this writ petition is allowed in terms of Neeraj Rani & Ors. case (supra) with a direction that the respondents shall be bound by the observations and directions issued by this Court in Neeraj Rani & Ors. case (supra) as well. (4). Ordered accordingly. 29.05.2026 (Sandeep Moudgil) V.Vishal Judge 1. Whether speaking/reasoned? : Yes/No

2. Whether reportable? : Yes/No V VISHAL SHONKAR 2026.06.05 10:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** 128 CWP-13759-2026 Decided on 29.05.2026 **** Sunita Devi & Ors. ... Petitioners VS. Mission Director-NHM, Haryana & Ors. ... Respondents **** CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL **** Present: Mr. Ravinder Singh Dhull, Advocate for petitioners Mr. Deepak Balyan, Addl. AG Haryana Mr. Arvind Seth, Sr. Panel Counsel, UOI **** Sandeep Moudgil, J. (1). The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuing a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to regularize the services of the petitioners on their respective posts from the date of their initial appointment with all consequential benefits in view of the order dated 18.04.2026 passed by this Court in a bunch of similar writ petitions including in CWP-35408-2025 (Neeraj Rani & Ors. vs. State of Haryana & Ors.). (2). Learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned State counsel are ad idem and do not dispute the fact that the case of the petitioners is squarely covered by the dictum of this Court rendered in Neeraj Rani & Ors. case (supra). (3). Accordingly, this writ petition is allowed in terms of Neeraj Rani & Ors. case (supra) with a direction that the respondents shall be bound by the observations and directions issued by this Court in Neeraj Rani & Ors. case (supra) as well. (4). Ordered accordingly. 29.05.2026 (Sandeep Moudgil) V.Vishal Judge 1. Whether speaking/reasoned? : Yes/No

2. Whether reportable? : Yes/No V VISHAL SHONKAR 2026.06.05 10:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document