CRM-M-3057CRMCRMCRM 30573057305771-2026717171 202620262026 1 168168168168 ININININ TTHETTHETTHETTHE HIGHHIGHHIGHHIGH COURTCOURTCOURTCOURT OFOFOFOF PUNJABPUNJABPUNJABPUNJABBBBB ANDANDANDAND HARYANAHARYANAHARYANAHARYANA ATATATAT CHANDIGARCHANDIGARCHANDIGARCHANDIGARRHRHRHRH CRM-M-30571CRMCRMCRM 30571-23057130571 2026202620262026 Sunita Devi ....Petitioner versus State of Harryana and others ....Respondents DateDateDateDate ofofofof decidecidecideciision:ision:ision:ision: MayMayMayMay 29,292929,,, 2026202620262026 DateDateDateDate ofofofof UploUploUplUploading:oading:oading:oading: MayMayMayMay 29,292929,,, 2026202620262026 CORAM:CORAM:CORAM:CORAM: HON’BLEHON’BLEHON’BLEHON’BLE MR.MR.MR.MR. JUSTICEJUSTICEJUSTICEJUSTICE SUMSUMSUMSUMMEETMEETMEETMEET GOELGOELGOELGOEL Present:PresentPresentPresent Mr. Mahesh Inder Preet, Advoc ate for Mr. Jarnail Singh Saneta, Advoccate for the petitioner. ***** SUMEETSUMEETSUMEETSUMEET GGOEL,GGOELGGOELGGOEL,,, J.J.J.J. (ORAL)(ORAL)(ORAL)(ORAL) The substantive prayer made in the petition in hand reads thus:

“It is, therefore, respectfully prayeed that this petition may kindly be allowed and the appropriate direcction may kindly be issued to the respondent No.4 not to interfere in the free plying of the vehicle of the petitioner bearing registration HR-445-D-6473 in view of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court off India reported in RCR Criminal 2007(2) page 76 titled as "ICICII Bank Ltd. Vs Parkash Kaur and others" and Judgment of the Hon'bble Supreme Court of India reported in SLP (Crl.) No. 4935 of 2006 dececided on 15.5.2008 in case titled as "ICICI Bank Vs. Shanti Devi Sharmma & Ors", keeping in view thefacts andcircumstancesofthecase;intheheinterestofjustice.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitiooner submits that the petitioner would be saatisfied, in case a direction is issu ed to the concerned authority to consider annd take a conscious decision on the representation dated 12.05.2026 (Annexure P-3) made by the petittioner. 3. On the other hand, on advance service of copy of petition, Ms. Priyanka Saadar Thakur, Senior DAG Haryanna causes appearance on behalf MAHAVIR SINGH of respondennts No.1 to 3 and submits that gr ievance of the petitioner will be 2026.05.29 17:16 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment CRM-M-30571CRMCRMCRM 30571-20263057130571 202620262026 2

looked into by the concerned authority, i.e., Superintendent of Police, Karnal (respondent No.2) and it shall take decision either way, on the representation dated 12.05.2026 (Annexure P-3) of the petitioner. 4. Given the nature of order being passed, there is no necessity to seek reply by any of the respondents as no further proceedings and/or pleadings are required. 5. Without commenting on the merits of the case, the petition in hand is disposeddisposeddisposeddisposed ofofofof with a direction to the concerned authority, i.e., Superintendent of Police, Karnal (respondent No.2) to consider representation dated 12.05.2026 (Annexure P-3) of the petitioner and take a ratiocinated decision thereupon, in accordance with law, within a period of 02 weeks from the date of receipt/ production of certified copy of this order and the same be communicated to the petitioner thereafter. 6. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (SUMEET(SUMEET(SUMEET(SUMEET GOEL)GOEL)GOEL)GOEL) JUDGEJUDGEJUDGEJUDGE MayMayMayMay 29,292929,,, 2026202620262026 mahavir Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No MAHAVIR SINGH 2026.05.29 17:16 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment

CRM-M-3057CRMCRMCRM 30573057305771-2026717171 202620262026 1 168168168168 ININININ TTHETTHETTHETTHE HIGHHIGHHIGHHIGH COURTCOURTCOURTCOURT OFOFOFOF PUNJABPUNJABPUNJABPUNJABBBBB ANDANDANDAND HARYANAHARYANAHARYANAHARYANA ATATATAT CHANDIGARCHANDIGARCHANDIGARCHANDIGARRHRHRHRH CRM-M-30571CRMCRMCRM 30571-23057130571 2026202620262026 Sunita Devi ....Petitioner versus State of Harryana and others ....Respondents DateDateDateDate ofofofof decidecidecideciision:ision:ision:ision: MayMayMayMay 29,292929,,, 2026202620262026 DateDateDateDate ofofofof UploUploUplUploading:oading:oading:oading: MayMayMayMay 29,292929,,, 2026202620262026 CORAM:CORAM:CORAM:CORAM: HON’BLEHON’BLEHON’BLEHON’BLE MR.MR.MR.MR. JUSTICEJUSTICEJUSTICEJUSTICE SUMSUMSUMSUMMEETMEETMEETMEET GOELGOELGOELGOEL Present:PresentPresentPresent Mr. Mahesh Inder Preet, Advoc ate for Mr. Jarnail Singh Saneta, Advoccate for the petitioner. ***** SUMEETSUMEETSUMEETSUMEET GGOEL,GGOELGGOELGGOEL,,, J.J.J.J. (ORAL)(ORAL)(ORAL)(ORAL) The substantive prayer made in the petition in hand reads thus:

“It is, therefore, respectfully prayeed that this petition may kindly be allowed and the appropriate direcction may kindly be issued to the respondent No.4 not to interfere in the free plying of the vehicle of the petitioner bearing registration HR-445-D-6473 in view of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court off India reported in RCR Criminal 2007(2) page 76 titled as "ICICII Bank Ltd. Vs Parkash Kaur and others" and Judgment of the Hon'bble Supreme Court of India reported in SLP (Crl.) No. 4935 of 2006 dececided on 15.5.2008 in case titled as "ICICI Bank Vs. Shanti Devi Sharmma & Ors", keeping in view thefacts andcircumstancesofthecase;intheheinterestofjustice.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitiooner submits that the petitioner would be saatisfied, in case a direction is issu ed to the concerned authority to consider annd take a conscious decision on the representation dated 12.05.2026 (Annexure P-3) made by the petittioner. 3. On the other hand, on advance service of copy of petition, Ms. Priyanka Saadar Thakur, Senior DAG Haryanna causes appearance on behalf MAHAVIR SINGH of respondennts No.1 to 3 and submits that gr ievance of the petitioner will be 2026.05.29 17:16 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment CRM-M-30571CRMCRMCRM 30571-20263057130571 202620262026 2

looked into by the concerned authority, i.e., Superintendent of Police, Karnal (respondent No.2) and it shall take decision either way, on the representation dated 12.05.2026 (Annexure P-3) of the petitioner. 4. Given the nature of order being passed, there is no necessity to seek reply by any of the respondents as no further proceedings and/or pleadings are required. 5. Without commenting on the merits of the case, the petition in hand is disposeddisposeddisposeddisposed ofofofof with a direction to the concerned authority, i.e., Superintendent of Police, Karnal (respondent No.2) to consider representation dated 12.05.2026 (Annexure P-3) of the petitioner and take a ratiocinated decision thereupon, in accordance with law, within a period of 02 weeks from the date of receipt/ production of certified copy of this order and the same be communicated to the petitioner thereafter. 6. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (SUMEET(SUMEET(SUMEET(SUMEET GOEL)GOEL)GOEL)GOEL) JUDGEJUDGEJUDGEJUDGE MayMayMayMay 29,292929,,, 2026202620262026 mahavir Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No MAHAVIR SINGH 2026.05.29 17:16 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment