CRM-M-31764-2026 (O&M) 1 181 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-31764-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 29.05.2026 RIYAZUDDIN ... PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA ... RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL Present- Ms. Kompal Arora, Advocate for the petitioner. H.S. GREWAL, J. (ORAL) 1. This petition has been filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 (erstwhile 482 of Cr.P.C) for setting aside the impugned order dated 06.04.2026 passed by the Ld. Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Panchkula in case bearing No. SC/31/2025 dated 17.03.2025 titled as "State of Haryana v. Rakesh and Others" arising out of FIR NO. 225 dated 13.11.2024 (Annexure P-2) registered under section 109 (1), 132, 281, 3 (5) of BNS, 2023 (corresponding IPC Sections 307,353, 279, 34 of IPC, 25 (1-A) of the Arms Act, 1959 registered at Police Station Raipur Rani, District Panchkula, whereby the Ld. Addl. Sessions Judge, Panchkula has rejected the application for exemption from personal appearance filed by the petitioner and has cancelled the regular bail granted to the petitioner.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was required to appear in another criminal case, therefore, he could not appear before the learned trial Court on the date fixed. Consequently, his bail was cancelled and his bail bonds and surety bonds were also cancelled and JANKI BHATT forfeited to the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that 2026.05.29 17:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh CRM-M-31764-2026 (O&M) 2 the petitioner is ready and willing to join the proceedings before the Court and prays that the impugned order be set aside. 3. Notice of motion. 4. On the asking of the Court, Mr. Parneet Singh Pandher, A.A.G., Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State. 5. I have heard the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and gone through the case file. 6. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioner, this Court does not find any legitimate ground to interfere in the impugned order dated 06.04.2026 passed by the Ld. Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Panchkula. However, in case the petitioner surrenders before the trial Court within next 07 working days from today and moves an application for grant of regular bail, the same shall be considered and decided by the Court concerned within a period of three days. 7. The petition stands disposed of. (H.S.GREWAL) 29.05.2026 JUDGE Janki Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No

Whether reportable : Yes/No JANKI BHATT 2026.05.29 17:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh

CRM-M-31764-2026 (O&M) 1 181 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-31764-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 29.05.2026 RIYAZUDDIN ... PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA ... RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL Present- Ms. Kompal Arora, Advocate for the petitioner. H.S. GREWAL, J. (ORAL) 1. This petition has been filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 (erstwhile 482 of Cr.P.C) for setting aside the impugned order dated 06.04.2026 passed by the Ld. Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Panchkula in case bearing No. SC/31/2025 dated 17.03.2025 titled as "State of Haryana v. Rakesh and Others" arising out of FIR NO. 225 dated 13.11.2024 (Annexure P-2) registered under section 109 (1), 132, 281, 3 (5) of BNS, 2023 (corresponding IPC Sections 307,353, 279, 34 of IPC, 25 (1-A) of the Arms Act, 1959 registered at Police Station Raipur Rani, District Panchkula, whereby the Ld. Addl. Sessions Judge, Panchkula has rejected the application for exemption from personal appearance filed by the petitioner and has cancelled the regular bail granted to the petitioner.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was required to appear in another criminal case, therefore, he could not appear before the learned trial Court on the date fixed. Consequently, his bail was cancelled and his bail bonds and surety bonds were also cancelled and JANKI BHATT forfeited to the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that 2026.05.29 17:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh CRM-M-31764-2026 (O&M) 2 the petitioner is ready and willing to join the proceedings before the Court and prays that the impugned order be set aside. 3. Notice of motion. 4. On the asking of the Court, Mr. Parneet Singh Pandher, A.A.G., Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State. 5. I have heard the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and gone through the case file. 6. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioner, this Court does not find any legitimate ground to interfere in the impugned order dated 06.04.2026 passed by the Ld. Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Panchkula. However, in case the petitioner surrenders before the trial Court within next 07 working days from today and moves an application for grant of regular bail, the same shall be considered and decided by the Court concerned within a period of three days. 7. The petition stands disposed of. (H.S.GREWAL) 29.05.2026 JUDGE Janki Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No

Whether reportable : Yes/No JANKI BHATT 2026.05.29 17:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh