CRWP-6506-22026 (O&M) (1) IN THE HHIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AAND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (127 ) CRRWP-6506-2026 (O&M) D ate of decision : 29.05.2026 KULWINDERR KAUR ... Petitioner Versus STATE OF PUUNJAB AND OTHERS ...Respondents CORAM: HOON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANNISHA BATRA Present: Mrr. Rajesh Kapil, Advocate and Mss. Himani Kapila, Advocate for tthe petitioner Mss. Ruchika Sabherwal, Senior DAAG, Punjab **** MANISHA BAATRA, J. (ORAL) 1. Thhe present petition has been fileed under Article 226 of the Constitution off India seeking issuance of a writt of mandamus directing the official responddents No. 2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner fromm respondents No.4 to 25 by connsidering her representation dated 19.05.20226 (Annexure P2) and directingg private respondents not to interfere in thee personal lives and liberty of the petitioner and to direct respondent No .2 to take appropriate action oon the representation dated 19.05.2026 (Annnexure P2) 2. At the very outset, learned counnsel for the petitioner has submitted that tthe petitioner has recently filed aa representation on AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.29 15:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRWP-6506-22026 (O&M) (2)

19.05.2026 (Annnexure P-2) before respondent NNo. 2-Senior Superintendent of Police, Gurddaspur raising her grievances aas mentioned in the present petition but thee same has not yet been consideered and no action has been taken thereon. HHe further submitted that at thiss stage, the petitioner would be satisfied if aappropriate directions are issuedd to respondent No.2- Senior Superintendent of Police, Gurdaspur to decide the aforesaid representation filed by the petiitioner and take necessary actionn thereon. 3. Nootice of motion. 4. Mss. Ruchika Sabherwal, Senior DDAG, Punjab, has advance notice on behallf of the respondents-State and ssubmits that the needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of thhe paper-book be supplied to her during the ccourse of the day. 5. In view of the limited prayer madde by the petitioner, without commenting annything on the merits of the ccase, the present petition is disposed of at tthis stage with a direction to resspondent No. 2 to decide the aforesaid repressentation dated 19.05.2026 (Annnexure P-2) of the petitioner within a periodd of one month from today, by passing a speaking order in accordance withh law and take necessary action, if so required. (MMANISHA BATRA) JUDGE 29.05.2026 Whether speaking/reasoned:- YYes/No Amit Sharma Whether reportable:- Yes/No AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.29 15:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.

CRWP-6506-22026 (O&M) (1) IN THE HHIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AAND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (127 ) CRRWP-6506-2026 (O&M) D ate of decision : 29.05.2026 KULWINDERR KAUR ... Petitioner Versus STATE OF PUUNJAB AND OTHERS ...Respondents CORAM: HOON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANNISHA BATRA Present: Mrr. Rajesh Kapil, Advocate and Mss. Himani Kapila, Advocate for tthe petitioner Mss. Ruchika Sabherwal, Senior DAAG, Punjab **** MANISHA BAATRA, J. (ORAL) 1. Thhe present petition has been fileed under Article 226 of the Constitution off India seeking issuance of a writt of mandamus directing the official responddents No. 2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner fromm respondents No.4 to 25 by connsidering her representation dated 19.05.20226 (Annexure P2) and directingg private respondents not to interfere in thee personal lives and liberty of the petitioner and to direct respondent No .2 to take appropriate action oon the representation dated 19.05.2026 (Annnexure P2) 2. At the very outset, learned counnsel for the petitioner has submitted that tthe petitioner has recently filed aa representation on AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.29 15:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRWP-6506-22026 (O&M) (2)

19.05.2026 (Annnexure P-2) before respondent NNo. 2-Senior Superintendent of Police, Gurddaspur raising her grievances aas mentioned in the present petition but thee same has not yet been consideered and no action has been taken thereon. HHe further submitted that at thiss stage, the petitioner would be satisfied if aappropriate directions are issuedd to respondent No.2- Senior Superintendent of Police, Gurdaspur to decide the aforesaid representation filed by the petiitioner and take necessary actionn thereon. 3. Nootice of motion. 4. Mss. Ruchika Sabherwal, Senior DDAG, Punjab, has advance notice on behallf of the respondents-State and ssubmits that the needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of thhe paper-book be supplied to her during the ccourse of the day. 5. In view of the limited prayer madde by the petitioner, without commenting annything on the merits of the ccase, the present petition is disposed of at tthis stage with a direction to resspondent No. 2 to decide the aforesaid repressentation dated 19.05.2026 (Annnexure P-2) of the petitioner within a periodd of one month from today, by passing a speaking order in accordance withh law and take necessary action, if so required. (MMANISHA BATRA) JUDGE 29.05.2026 Whether speaking/reasoned:- YYes/No Amit Sharma Whether reportable:- Yes/No AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.29 15:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.