IN THHE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARHH 156 CRM-M---31662-2026(O&M) Date of deecision: 29.05.2026 Rakesh Kumar ...Petitioner(s) VERSUS State of Haryanaa and others ...Respondent(s) CORAM : HOON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOOD S. BHARDWAJ Present :- Mr.. Nitish Kumar, Advocate for Mr.. J.S. Saneta,, Advocate for the ppetitioner. ***** VINOD S. BHAARDWAJ, J. (Oral) Thee present petition has been filed seeking directions to respondent No. 4 not to interfere in the free pplying of the vehicle of the petitioner bearinng registration No.HR-45-E-134 3 in view of the judgment of Hon’ble Supremme Court of India passed in th e matter of Manager, ICICI Bank Ltd., Vs . Prakash Kaur and others r eported as 2007(2) R.C.R. (Criminal) 76 annd in the matter of ICICI Bank Vs. Shanti Devi Sharma and others reported aas 2008(3) R.C.R. (Criminal) 463. 2. Aft er arguing the matter at somme length, learned counsel appearing on bbehalf of the petitioner seeks withdrawal of the present petition. 3. In vview of the above, the presennt petition is disposed of as withdrawn. 4. Pennding application(s), if any, shalll stand disposed of. (VINNOD S. BHARDWAJ) 29.05.2026 JUDGE Sumit Gusain Whether sppeaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether repportable : Yes/No SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2026.05.29 18:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

IN THHE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARHH 156 CRM-M---31662-2026(O&M) Date of deecision: 29.05.2026 Rakesh Kumar ...Petitioner(s) VERSUS State of Haryanaa and others ...Respondent(s) CORAM : HOON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOOD S. BHARDWAJ Present :- Mr.. Nitish Kumar, Advocate for Mr.. J.S. Saneta,, Advocate for the ppetitioner. ***** VINOD S. BHAARDWAJ, J. (Oral) Thee present petition has been filed seeking directions to respondent No. 4 not to interfere in the free pplying of the vehicle of the petitioner bearinng registration No.HR-45-E-134 3 in view of the judgment of Hon’ble Supremme Court of India passed in th e matter of Manager, ICICI Bank Ltd., Vs . Prakash Kaur and others r eported as 2007(2) R.C.R. (Criminal) 76 annd in the matter of ICICI Bank Vs. Shanti Devi Sharma and others reported aas 2008(3) R.C.R. (Criminal) 463. 2. Aft er arguing the matter at somme length, learned counsel appearing on bbehalf of the petitioner seeks withdrawal of the present petition. 3. In vview of the above, the presennt petition is disposed of as withdrawn. 4. Pennding application(s), if any, shalll stand disposed of. (VINNOD S. BHARDWAJ) 29.05.2026 JUDGE Sumit Gusain Whether sppeaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether repportable : Yes/No SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2026.05.29 18:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document