Patna High Court
Gopal Kumar Jha v. State Bank Of India & Ors.
CWJC/7809/2017
- Decision date
- 2026-08-20
- Text availability
- Full text
- Judges
- G. Anupama Chakravarthy
Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗
Connected provisions and cases
No further provision or case links are recorded.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7809 of 2017 ====================================================== Gopal Kumar Jha son of Late Diwakar Jha resident of village P.O. - Musapur, P.S. - Ghatho, District - Samastipur, Pin - 848114 Bihar at presiding at Ramsharan Bhawan Road No. - 6C, Rajendra Nagar, P.S. - Kadamkuan, District - Patna - 800016. ... ... Petitioner Versus 1. State Bank Of India, A Govt. of India owned Corporation, Corporate Centre, State Bank Bhawan Madam Cama Road, Mumbai-400021, through its Chairman. 2. The Chairman, State Bank of India Corporate Centre, Corporate Centre, State Bank Bhawan Madam Cama Road, Mumbai – 400021. 3. Union of India through Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Govt. of India. 4. Chief General Manager, State Bank of India, Bihar Regional Local Head Office, Patna. 5. The General Manager, Network - 1, State Bank of India, Local Head Office, West Gandhi Maidan, Patna 6. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank of India, RACPC, West Gandhi Maidan, Patna - 800001. 7. Branch Manager SPB Branch of State Bank of India, West of Gandhi Maidan, Patna - 800001. ... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance : For The Petitioner : Mr. Alok Ranjan, Advocate For The Respondent : Mr. Anjani Kumar Mishra, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. G. ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY ORAL ORDER
3 20-08-2026 1. It is reported by the Learned counsel for the petitioner that he intends to withdraw the Writ petition with a liberty to approach the appropriate forum. 2. Liberty is granted. 3. Therefore, the Writ petition is dismissed Patna High Court CWJC No.7809 of 2017(3) dt.20-08-2026 2/2 as withdrawn. 4. The appropriate forum shall liberally consider the aspect of limitation, as the Writ petition has been filed in the year 2017 itself. (G. Anupama Chakravarthy, J) Shanu/- U