Patna High Court
Sujeet Kumar Chaudhary v. The State Bank of India
MJC/4009/2019
- Decision date
- 2026-08-19
- Text availability
- Full text
- Judges
- Ritesh Kumar
Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗
Connected provisions and cases
No further provision or case links are recorded.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4009 of 2019 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1718 of 2017 ====================================================== Sujeet Kumar Chaudhary S/o- Sri Shyam Nandan Chaudhary Resident of village- Khas Tabka Tole- Narwan, Ward No. 06, P.O. Chakbeduliya, P.S. Vibhutipur, District- Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Bank of India through Zonal Manager, Bihar Patna Sri P.K. Verma, S/o- Late Ramji Verma, Resident of Sigm, P.S. Vaishali, District-Vaishali. 2. The State Bank of India Stressed Assets Recovery Branch (SARB), 2nd Floor, Main Branch, Building, West Gandhi Maidan, Patna- 800001, Sri S.K. Verma, S/o- P.K. Verma, Resident of Village- Beriyahi, P.S.- Besar (O.P.), District- Vaishali. 3. The Divisional Zonal Manager, State Bank of India, Muzaffarpur Sri R.K. Verma, S/o S.K. Verma, Resident of Village- Ghataro, P.S. Lalganj, District-Vaishali. 4. The Branch Manager, State Bank of India, Dalsingsarai Branch, Dist. Samastipur, Sri R.K. Singh, S/o- S.K. Singh, Resident of Village-Mathurapur, P.S. Warisnagar, District- Samastipur. 5. The Recovery Officer State Bank of India, Dalsingsarai Branch, Dist. Samastipur, Sri......................, S/o A.N. Singh, Resident of Village-Bachawra, P.S. Bachawara, District- Begusarai. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Dilip Kumar Roy, Advocate For the Bank : Mr. Binod Bihari Sinha, Advocate Mr. Amarjeet Chaudhary, Advocate Mr. Ajay Dutt Mishra, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RITESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 19-08-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order under contempt has already been complied with and, therefore, no contempt survives. 3. Accordingly, the present contempt petition is Patna High Court MJC No.4009 of 2019(2) dt.19-08-2026 2/2 dismissed as having become infructuous. (Ritesh Kumar, J.) Sanjay/- U