IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2005 of 2025 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.899 of 2024 ====================================================== 1. Amit Kumar, S/O Sidhnath Prasad, resident of-Saguna, P. S. -Danapur, District- Patna. 2. Nand Jee Singh, S/O Radha mohan Singh, R/o Sohnipatti, P.S- Buxar Town, District-Buxar. 3. Manoj Kumar Singh, S/O Kashinath Singh, R/O Mishrawallya, Ashok Nagar, P.S Buxar (M), District- Buxar. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, New, Secretariat, Patna. 2. Sri S. Siddharth, I.A.S, The Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna. 3. Sri Yogendra Singh, I.A.S., The Director Secondary Education cum Chief Executive Officer, Bihar Board of Open Schooling and Examination and Examination Board. New Secretariat, Patna. 4. Sri Pankaj Kumar, The Director Primary Education, Govt of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna. 5. Sri Anand Kishor, I.A.S, The Chairman, Bihar School Examination Board, Budh Marg, Patna. 6. Sri Pramod Kumar, The Secretary, Bihar School Examination Board, Budh Marg, Patna. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Surendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Standing Counsel 11 ======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 3 18-08-2026 Heard the parties. 2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief(s): “for initiation of contempt proceeding against the contemnors/opposite parties for their Patna High Court MJC No.2005 of 2025(3) dt.18-08-2026 2/2 willful disobedience of the order dated 12.02.2025 passed in CWJC No. 899 of 2024.” 3. At the outset, learned State counsel submits that the order stands complied. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that liberty may be granted to agitate the matter. 5. Granting liberty to the petitioners to agitate the matter, if grievance still remains, the present contempt petition stands disposed of. (Rajiv Roy, J) Adnan/- U

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2005 of 2025 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.899 of 2024 ====================================================== 1. Amit Kumar, S/O Sidhnath Prasad, resident of-Saguna, P. S. -Danapur, District- Patna. 2. Nand Jee Singh, S/O Radha mohan Singh, R/o Sohnipatti, P.S- Buxar Town, District-Buxar. 3. Manoj Kumar Singh, S/O Kashinath Singh, R/O Mishrawallya, Ashok Nagar, P.S Buxar (M), District- Buxar. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, New, Secretariat, Patna. 2. Sri S. Siddharth, I.A.S, The Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna. 3. Sri Yogendra Singh, I.A.S., The Director Secondary Education cum Chief Executive Officer, Bihar Board of Open Schooling and Examination and Examination Board. New Secretariat, Patna. 4. Sri Pankaj Kumar, The Director Primary Education, Govt of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna. 5. Sri Anand Kishor, I.A.S, The Chairman, Bihar School Examination Board, Budh Marg, Patna. 6. Sri Pramod Kumar, The Secretary, Bihar School Examination Board, Budh Marg, Patna. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Surendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Standing Counsel 11 ======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 3 18-08-2026 Heard the parties. 2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief(s): “for initiation of contempt proceeding against the contemnors/opposite parties for their Patna High Court MJC No.2005 of 2025(3) dt.18-08-2026 2/2 willful disobedience of the order dated 12.02.2025 passed in CWJC No. 899 of 2024.” 3. At the outset, learned State counsel submits that the order stands complied. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that liberty may be granted to agitate the matter. 5. Granting liberty to the petitioners to agitate the matter, if grievance still remains, the present contempt petition stands disposed of. (Rajiv Roy, J) Adnan/- U