IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.171 of 2026 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19247 of 2024 ====================================================== Md. Zainul Abedin Ansari, Son of Late Siddique Mohammad Ansari, Resident of Village- Sedahan, Police Station- Tarari, District- Bhojpur. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through Sri Dharmendra Singh, Secretary, Cooperative Department Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 2. Smt. Smriti Kumari, Officer on Special Duty cum Deputy Secretary, Cooperative Department. Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3. Sri Rajnish Kumar Singh, Registrar, Cooperative Societies, 2nd Floor, Vikash Bhawan, New Secretariat, Bihar, Patna. 4. Sri Sunil Kumar, Managing Director, Bihar State Food and Civil Supply Corporation Ltd. Khadya Bhawan, Daroga Prasad Rai Path, R. Block, Road No. 2, Patna- Bihar. 5. Sri Navdeep Shukla, District Magistrate, Banka. 6. Sri Santosh Kumar, the then District Cooperative Officer, Banka. 7. Sri Onkar Kumar, Block Cooperative Officer, Chaandan, Banka cum Manager, Vyapar Mandal, Chaandan. 8. Sri Ranjan Kumar Rajiv, the then Cooperative Extension Officer cum Manager, Chaandan Vyapar Mandal, Banka. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shailesh Kumar- Advocate Mr. Ali Muqtadir Ahmad- Advocate

For the State : Mr. Mr. Abbas Haider-Standing Counsel 6 For B.S.F.C. : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh Dr. Anand Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 2 17-08-2026 1. Heard, Mr. Shailesh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the B.S.F.C. and Mr. Abbas Haider, the learned SC-6 for the State. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner, after some Patna High Court MJC No.171 of 2026(2) dt.17-08-2026 2/2 argument, seeks permission to withdraw the present contempt application. 3. Permission is accorded. 4. Accordingly, instant contempt application is dismissed as withdrawn. (Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.171 of 2026 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19247 of 2024 ====================================================== Md. Zainul Abedin Ansari, Son of Late Siddique Mohammad Ansari, Resident of Village- Sedahan, Police Station- Tarari, District- Bhojpur. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through Sri Dharmendra Singh, Secretary, Cooperative Department Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 2. Smt. Smriti Kumari, Officer on Special Duty cum Deputy Secretary, Cooperative Department. Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3. Sri Rajnish Kumar Singh, Registrar, Cooperative Societies, 2nd Floor, Vikash Bhawan, New Secretariat, Bihar, Patna. 4. Sri Sunil Kumar, Managing Director, Bihar State Food and Civil Supply Corporation Ltd. Khadya Bhawan, Daroga Prasad Rai Path, R. Block, Road No. 2, Patna- Bihar. 5. Sri Navdeep Shukla, District Magistrate, Banka. 6. Sri Santosh Kumar, the then District Cooperative Officer, Banka. 7. Sri Onkar Kumar, Block Cooperative Officer, Chaandan, Banka cum Manager, Vyapar Mandal, Chaandan. 8. Sri Ranjan Kumar Rajiv, the then Cooperative Extension Officer cum Manager, Chaandan Vyapar Mandal, Banka. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shailesh Kumar- Advocate Mr. Ali Muqtadir Ahmad- Advocate

For the State : Mr. Mr. Abbas Haider-Standing Counsel 6 For B.S.F.C. : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh Dr. Anand Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 2 17-08-2026 1. Heard, Mr. Shailesh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the B.S.F.C. and Mr. Abbas Haider, the learned SC-6 for the State. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner, after some Patna High Court MJC No.171 of 2026(2) dt.17-08-2026 2/2 argument, seeks permission to withdraw the present contempt application. 3. Permission is accorded. 4. Accordingly, instant contempt application is dismissed as withdrawn. (Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U