Patna High Court
Md. Imam Ali v. The State of Bihar
- Decision date
- 2026-08-17
- Text availability
- Full text
- Judges
- Rajiv Roy
Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗
Connected provisions and cases
No further provision or case links are recorded.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40096 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-172 Year-2026 Thana- GORAUL District- Vaishali ====================================================== Md. Imam Ali Son of Md. Kurban Ali @ Kurwan Ali Resident of Village-Khajechand Chhapra, P.S.- Goraul in the District of Vaishali. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranjeet Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Bharat Bhushan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 4 17-08-2026 Heard Mr. Ranjeet Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Bharat Bhushan, learned APP. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Goraul (Kathata) P.S. Case No. 172 of 2026 for the offence under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 74, 303(2), 109(1), 3(5) of the B.N.S. lodged on 18.03.2026 by the informant, Mustary Khatoon. 3. As per the prosecution story, the informant alleged that when she was cooking, the accused persons entered the kitchen and tried to outrage the modesty. The petitioner assaulted her mother by iron rod. Allegation of taking away the ornaments is also there. She was shifted to hospital which followed the FIR. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40096 of 2026(4) dt.17-08-2026 2/4
has no criminal antecedent and the injury has been found to be simple in nature Further, the submission is that without accepting the allegation and/or the outcome of the present petition in view of the fact that the informant’s side has alleged injuries, the petitioner(s) on its own would like to contribute Rs. 10,000/- towards the medical assistance through Demand Draft issued by the local State Bank of India/any Nationalized Bank branch to be submitted before the ‘NAZARAT’ of concerned Court to be handed over to the informant after checking the credentials. 5. Learned APP though opposes the prayer, submits that the injury has been found to be simple in nature. 6. Taking into account the submissions of the parties as also that he do not have criminal antecedent and the injury has been found to be simple in nature, in that background, this Court is inclined to extend him the privilege of anticipatory bail with conditions subject to payment of Rs. 10,000/- as undertaken by the learned counsel for the petitioner to be paid by Demand Draft of local State Bank of India branch/any Nationalized bank branch to be submitted to the Trial Court and shall be handed over to the informant. 7. Let the petitioner be released on bail in the event of Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40096 of 2026(4) dt.17-08-2026 3/4
arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from the receipt of this order, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Goraul (Kathata) P.S. Case No. 172 of 2026 subject to the following conditions: (i) one of the bailor should be the family member/relative of the petitioner who shall provide official document (Aadhaar Card/Voter ID Card/Pan Card/Driving License) to show his/her bona fide; (ii) the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of his bail bond by the Trial Court itself; (iii) the petitioner shall appear before the concerned police station every month for six months to mark his attendance and after the end of the period, the certificate shall be submitted before the Trial Court failing which steps shall be taken for the cancellation of the bail bonds; (iv) the petitioner shall in no way try to induce or promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidences, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40096 of 2026(4) dt.17-08-2026 4/4 cancellation of the bail bonds; (v) the petitioner shall desist from committing any criminal offence again, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds.
(Rajiv Roy, J) Sanny/- U T