IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.56335 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-91 Year-2026 Thana- Bahera District- Gaya ====================================================== Ramnath Yadav S/o Late Visheshwar Yadav R/o Village - Chaurahi, PS -Simariya, District - Chatra, State - Jharkhand ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pushp Raj Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Gauri Shankar Gupta, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 2 13-08-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Bahera P.S. Case No. 91 of 2026, instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a) and 33 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. 3. The prosecution case, in short, is that 920 liters spirit was recovered from pick-up vehicle and one car was used as a liner. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has got Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56335 of 2026(2) dt.13-08-2026 2/2

no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that the petitioner was not arrested from the pick-up vehicle from which spirit was recovered rather the petitioner was arrested from the car. The petitioner is in custody since 01.06.2026 and has got no criminal antecedent. There is no compliance of Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. 5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Bahera P.S. Case No. 91 of 2026. (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Rajorshi/- U T

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.56335 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-91 Year-2026 Thana- Bahera District- Gaya ====================================================== Ramnath Yadav S/o Late Visheshwar Yadav R/o Village - Chaurahi, PS -Simariya, District - Chatra, State - Jharkhand ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pushp Raj Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Gauri Shankar Gupta, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 2 13-08-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Bahera P.S. Case No. 91 of 2026, instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a) and 33 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. 3. The prosecution case, in short, is that 920 liters spirit was recovered from pick-up vehicle and one car was used as a liner. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has got Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56335 of 2026(2) dt.13-08-2026 2/2

no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that the petitioner was not arrested from the pick-up vehicle from which spirit was recovered rather the petitioner was arrested from the car. The petitioner is in custody since 01.06.2026 and has got no criminal antecedent. There is no compliance of Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. 5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Bahera P.S. Case No. 91 of 2026. (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Rajorshi/- U T