IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.52001 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-65 Year-2026 Thana- SIMRA District- West Champaran ====================================================== Vinay Mandal @ Binay Mandal @ Binay Krish Mandal S/o Late Lakshmi Kant R/o Vill.- Arvind Nagar Medraul, P.S.- Semra, Dist.- West Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Milind Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Brajendra Nath Pandey, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 29-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Semra P.S. Case No. 65 of 2026, instituted for the offences under Sections 190, 191(2), 115(2), 109(1), 118(1), 74, 351(2) and 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. The Prosecution case, in short, is that the informant’s daughter was on her way to work, the co-accused Baliram Mandal allegedly stopped the informant's daughter, Reshma Devi and targeted her with vulgar comments and abuse. When her daughter objected to the abuse, Baliram Mandal reportedly caught her hair with bad intention and threw her onto the road. In the meantime, informant came to her rescue, thereafter, all accused persons named in the F.I.R., including the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52001 of 2026(2) dt.29-07-2026 2/2 petitioner, Vinay Mandal assaulted both informant and her daughter with iron rod. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. 6. Having heard the parties and considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that there is specific allegation against the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 7. Accordingly, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is, hereby, rejected. 8. However, if the petitioner surrenders before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today and prays for regular bail, the same shall be disposed of on its own merit without being prejudiced by this order. (Alok Kumar, J) manish/- U T

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.52001 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-65 Year-2026 Thana- SIMRA District- West Champaran ====================================================== Vinay Mandal @ Binay Mandal @ Binay Krish Mandal S/o Late Lakshmi Kant R/o Vill.- Arvind Nagar Medraul, P.S.- Semra, Dist.- West Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Milind Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Brajendra Nath Pandey, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 29-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Semra P.S. Case No. 65 of 2026, instituted for the offences under Sections 190, 191(2), 115(2), 109(1), 118(1), 74, 351(2) and 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. The Prosecution case, in short, is that the informant’s daughter was on her way to work, the co-accused Baliram Mandal allegedly stopped the informant's daughter, Reshma Devi and targeted her with vulgar comments and abuse. When her daughter objected to the abuse, Baliram Mandal reportedly caught her hair with bad intention and threw her onto the road. In the meantime, informant came to her rescue, thereafter, all accused persons named in the F.I.R., including the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52001 of 2026(2) dt.29-07-2026 2/2 petitioner, Vinay Mandal assaulted both informant and her daughter with iron rod. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. 6. Having heard the parties and considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that there is specific allegation against the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 7. Accordingly, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is, hereby, rejected. 8. However, if the petitioner surrenders before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today and prays for regular bail, the same shall be disposed of on its own merit without being prejudiced by this order. (Alok Kumar, J) manish/- U T