IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14766 of 2025 ====================================================== Prusottam Kumar Sinha Son of Ramdev Prasad, Resident of Village and Post-Mohanpur, P.S.- Nagarnausa, District- Nalanda. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar Bihar. 2. The Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Reforms through its Principal Secretary. 3. The Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms. 4. The Director General of Police, Patna. 5. The Commissioner, Patna. 6. The District Magistrate, Patna. 7. The Superintendent of Police, Patna. 8. The Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Patna. 9. The Circle Officer, Sampatchak, Patna. 10. The Officer-in-Charge, Ramkrishna Nagar, Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Alok, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Prashant Pratap, GP- 02 Mr. Asit Kumar Jha, AC to GP-02 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 4 27-07-2026 Heard the parties. 2. The present application has been preferred for the following relief(s):

for the issuance of appropriate writ or order or orders or direction or directions commanding the respondents to conduct the inquiry over the issuance of forge and fabricated letters being letter No.479/25 dated 22.04.2025 issued under the seal and signature of D.C.L.R., Patna Patna High Court CWJC No.14766 of 2025(4) dt.27-07-2026 2/2 Sadar, Patna and Sanchika No.013 BLA (Margdarshan) 013/25 dated 15.07.2025 issued under the seal and signature of Additional Chief Secretary, the Department of Revenue and Land Reforms. It is relevant to mention here that on the basis of these forge and fabricated documents, the private respondent in connivance with the concerned police station has been trying to evict the petitioner in whose name title, Jamabandi and other records exist with regard to the said land. 3. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he shall be approaching the appropriate authority/Court for the redressal of the grievance against one Ravindra Kumar (who has not been made party respondent). 4. Granting said liberty, the writ petition is disposed of. (Rajiv Roy, J) Ravi/- U

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14766 of 2025 ====================================================== Prusottam Kumar Sinha Son of Ramdev Prasad, Resident of Village and Post-Mohanpur, P.S.- Nagarnausa, District- Nalanda. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar Bihar. 2. The Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Reforms through its Principal Secretary. 3. The Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms. 4. The Director General of Police, Patna. 5. The Commissioner, Patna. 6. The District Magistrate, Patna. 7. The Superintendent of Police, Patna. 8. The Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Patna. 9. The Circle Officer, Sampatchak, Patna. 10. The Officer-in-Charge, Ramkrishna Nagar, Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Alok, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Prashant Pratap, GP- 02 Mr. Asit Kumar Jha, AC to GP-02 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 4 27-07-2026 Heard the parties. 2. The present application has been preferred for the following relief(s):

for the issuance of appropriate writ or order or orders or direction or directions commanding the respondents to conduct the inquiry over the issuance of forge and fabricated letters being letter No.479/25 dated 22.04.2025 issued under the seal and signature of D.C.L.R., Patna Patna High Court CWJC No.14766 of 2025(4) dt.27-07-2026 2/2 Sadar, Patna and Sanchika No.013 BLA (Margdarshan) 013/25 dated 15.07.2025 issued under the seal and signature of Additional Chief Secretary, the Department of Revenue and Land Reforms. It is relevant to mention here that on the basis of these forge and fabricated documents, the private respondent in connivance with the concerned police station has been trying to evict the petitioner in whose name title, Jamabandi and other records exist with regard to the said land. 3. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he shall be approaching the appropriate authority/Court for the redressal of the grievance against one Ravindra Kumar (who has not been made party respondent). 4. Granting said liberty, the writ petition is disposed of. (Rajiv Roy, J) Ravi/- U