IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.47537 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-57 Year-2026 Thana- Bhopatpur District- East Champaran ====================================================== Nandan Kumar Son of Late Kishor Kumar Resident of Village- Asharfi Sah Tola, P.S.- Turkauliya, District- East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sarvesh Kashyap, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 2 27-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Bhopatpur PS Case No. 57 of 2026 instituted for the offences under Sections 8, 18, 21(c), 22(c) & 23 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. 3. Prosecution allegation, in short, is that there is recovery of 1.064 Kg opium from the possession of the co-accused, including the petitioner. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47537 of 2026(2) dt.27-07-2026 2/3

the petitioner further submits that petitioner has no concern with the recovered contraband. The recovered contraband is below the commercial quantity. Hence, Section 37 of the N.D.P.S. Act is not applicable in the present case. The petitioner is in custody since 08.05.2026 and has got no criminal antecedent. There is no compliance of Sections 42 and 50 of the N.D.P.S. Act. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, recovery below commercial quantity and the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 7. Let the petitioner be released on bail, after framing of charge, if not already framed, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.15,000/- (Fifteen thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Bhopatpur PS Case No. 57 of 2026, subject to the following conditions: (I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the family of the petitioner. (II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47537 of 2026(2) dt.27-07-2026 3/3 consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner. (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Raj Kishore/- U T

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.47537 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-57 Year-2026 Thana- Bhopatpur District- East Champaran ====================================================== Nandan Kumar Son of Late Kishor Kumar Resident of Village- Asharfi Sah Tola, P.S.- Turkauliya, District- East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sarvesh Kashyap, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 2 27-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Bhopatpur PS Case No. 57 of 2026 instituted for the offences under Sections 8, 18, 21(c), 22(c) & 23 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. 3. Prosecution allegation, in short, is that there is recovery of 1.064 Kg opium from the possession of the co-accused, including the petitioner. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47537 of 2026(2) dt.27-07-2026 2/3

the petitioner further submits that petitioner has no concern with the recovered contraband. The recovered contraband is below the commercial quantity. Hence, Section 37 of the N.D.P.S. Act is not applicable in the present case. The petitioner is in custody since 08.05.2026 and has got no criminal antecedent. There is no compliance of Sections 42 and 50 of the N.D.P.S. Act. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, recovery below commercial quantity and the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 7. Let the petitioner be released on bail, after framing of charge, if not already framed, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.15,000/- (Fifteen thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Bhopatpur PS Case No. 57 of 2026, subject to the following conditions: (I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the family of the petitioner. (II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47537 of 2026(2) dt.27-07-2026 3/3 consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner. (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Raj Kishore/- U T