IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48814 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-344 Year-2024 Thana- Cyber P.S. District- Saran ====================================================== 1. Tusar Pal @ Subham S/O Subhash @ Subhash Pal R/O Village-Muradgampur Parsi, P.S- Modinagar, District - Gajiyabad (U.P). 2. Akansha Singh D/O Surendra Pal Singh R/O Plot No.- A-26, New Defence Colony, Bhopura, P.S.- Shahibabad, Distt.- Gajiyabad (U.P.). ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Binod Murari Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nagendra Prasad, APP For the Informant : Mr. Satyendra Narayan Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 2 27-07-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Cyber P.S. Case No. 344 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 379, 420, 303(2), 318(4), 319(2) of the BNS and Sections 66(C) and (D) of the IT Act. 3. The allegation against the petitioners in the FIR is that they have defrauded a huge amount of money, out of which ₹15,66,000/- was credited to the accounts of the petitioners.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48814 of 2026(2) dt.27-07-2026 2/2 they have been falsely implicated in the present case. He further submitted that the petitioners were not aware of the withdrawal of money from their accounts. 5. Learned APP appearing for the State, assisted by learned counsel for the informant, vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail and submitted that the petitioners, along with others, are running a gang involved in defrauding innocent persons, including the informant. 6. Having considered the rival submissions advanced by the parties, particularly deposit of ₹15,66,000/- in the account of the petitioners, this Court is not inclined to grant bail. 7. Accordingly, this bail petition is dismissed. (Ranjan Kumar Jha, J) rishabh/- U T

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48814 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-344 Year-2024 Thana- Cyber P.S. District- Saran ====================================================== 1. Tusar Pal @ Subham S/O Subhash @ Subhash Pal R/O Village-Muradgampur Parsi, P.S- Modinagar, District - Gajiyabad (U.P). 2. Akansha Singh D/O Surendra Pal Singh R/O Plot No.- A-26, New Defence Colony, Bhopura, P.S.- Shahibabad, Distt.- Gajiyabad (U.P.). ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Binod Murari Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nagendra Prasad, APP For the Informant : Mr. Satyendra Narayan Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 2 27-07-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Cyber P.S. Case No. 344 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 379, 420, 303(2), 318(4), 319(2) of the BNS and Sections 66(C) and (D) of the IT Act. 3. The allegation against the petitioners in the FIR is that they have defrauded a huge amount of money, out of which ₹15,66,000/- was credited to the accounts of the petitioners.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48814 of 2026(2) dt.27-07-2026 2/2 they have been falsely implicated in the present case. He further submitted that the petitioners were not aware of the withdrawal of money from their accounts. 5. Learned APP appearing for the State, assisted by learned counsel for the informant, vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail and submitted that the petitioners, along with others, are running a gang involved in defrauding innocent persons, including the informant. 6. Having considered the rival submissions advanced by the parties, particularly deposit of ₹15,66,000/- in the account of the petitioners, this Court is not inclined to grant bail. 7. Accordingly, this bail petition is dismissed. (Ranjan Kumar Jha, J) rishabh/- U T