Patna High Court
Abhishek Kumar v. The State of Bihar
- Decision date
- 2026-07-27
- Text availability
- Full text
- Judges
- Purnendu Singh
Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗
Connected provisions and cases
No further provision or case links are recorded.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25959 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-184 Year-2025 Thana- MEDNI CHAUKI District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== Abhishek Kumar, aged about 41 years, Gender- Male, Son of Late Binod Keshari, Resident of Village- Medni Chowki, P.O- Amarpur, P.S- Medni Chowki, District- Lakhisarai. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mayank Bilochan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dilip Kumar No. 1, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 4 27-07-2026 Heard Mr. Mayank Bilochan, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Dilip Kumar No. 1, learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in connection with Mednir Chowki P.S. Case No. 184 of 2025, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 316(5), 318(4) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 7 of Essential Commodities Act, 1955.
3. As per the allegation made in the FIR, during a surprise inspection conducted on 17.12.2025 by the Block Agriculture Officer at the petitioner's fertilizer outlet, M/s Beej Bank, certain discrepancies were allegedly found between the physical stock of fertilizers and the entries in the POS machine, Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25959 of 2026(4) dt.27-07-2026 2/2 indicating stock irregularities. On the basis of the inspection report submitted by the Block Agriculture Officer, the present case was instituted against the petitioner. 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that license of the petitioner has been cancelled on the said allegation without preparing any seizure list though a copy of details of different variety of fertilizers were forwarded to the District Magistrate, Lakhisarai contained in Memo No. 2072 dated 18.12.2025, which was prepared in presence of the petitioner. Learned counsel submitted that for the same allegation, the petitioner is facing the present prosecution, as well as, the matter relating to cancellation of his license is pending before the District Magistrate. In these backgrounds, learned counsel seeks to withdraw the present application with a liberty to avail appropriate remedy in accordance with law. 5. Accordingly, the present application stands dismissed as withdrawn. (Purnendu Singh, J) Niraj/- U T