IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8851 of 2026 ====================================================== Arun Pandey Son of Late Umesh Pandey, Resident of Village - Ismailchak, P.S. - Sonepur, District- Saran. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar Through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Commissioner, Saran at Chapra. 4. The District Magistrate-cum Collector, Saran, Chapra. 5. The Superintendent of Police, Saran at Chapra. 6. The Sub Divisional Officer, Sonepur, Saran. 7. The D.C.L.R, Sonepur, Saran. 8. The Circle Officer, Sonepur, Saran. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dhananjay Mishra, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Prashant Pratap, GP-2 Mr. Asit Kumar Jha, AC to GP-2 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 3 27-07-2026 Heard the parties. 2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief(s): “(i) For issuance of the order/s, directions or appropriate writ to stay over ejectment process (eviction/dispossession) conducted by the Circle Officer, Sonepur, Saran (Respondent No.8) without prior notice over the land appertaining to Khata No. 90, Khesra No. 440 Patna High Court CWJC No.8851 of 2026(3) dt.27-07-2026 2/3

Rakba 07.5 dhur (Seven Katha five dhur) situated under Mauza Ismailchak, Sonepur which is lawful in physical possession of the petitioner. (ii) For issuance of order/s, directions or appropriate writ to direct the Respondent No. 8 don't bother peaceful physical possession of the petitioner over the land appertaining to Khata No. 90, Khesra No. 440 Rakba 07.5 dhur (Seven Katha five dhur) situated under Mauza Ismailchak, Sonepur through his ancestors under Succession right. (iii) For any other relief/reliefs for which the petitioner may found entitled.” 3. Mr. Dhananjay Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that it will suffice if the petitioner is allowed to agitate the matter before the Collector, Saran at Chapra (respondent no. 4). 4. Learned State counsel has no objection to it. 5. In that background, the writ petition stands disposed of allowing the petitioners to approach the Collector, Saran at Chapra (respondent no. 4) within a period of four weeks who shall be duty bound to look into the matter and pass Patna High Court CWJC No.8851 of 2026(3) dt.27-07-2026 3/3 an appropriate order, in accordance with law, preferably within a period of four months thereafter. 6. The final outcome of the order passed by the Collector, Saran at Chapra will decide the fate of the land in question. (Rajiv Roy, J) Adnan/- U

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8851 of 2026 ====================================================== Arun Pandey Son of Late Umesh Pandey, Resident of Village - Ismailchak, P.S. - Sonepur, District- Saran. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar Through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Commissioner, Saran at Chapra. 4. The District Magistrate-cum Collector, Saran, Chapra. 5. The Superintendent of Police, Saran at Chapra. 6. The Sub Divisional Officer, Sonepur, Saran. 7. The D.C.L.R, Sonepur, Saran. 8. The Circle Officer, Sonepur, Saran. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dhananjay Mishra, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Prashant Pratap, GP-2 Mr. Asit Kumar Jha, AC to GP-2 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 3 27-07-2026 Heard the parties. 2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief(s): “(i) For issuance of the order/s, directions or appropriate writ to stay over ejectment process (eviction/dispossession) conducted by the Circle Officer, Sonepur, Saran (Respondent No.8) without prior notice over the land appertaining to Khata No. 90, Khesra No. 440 Patna High Court CWJC No.8851 of 2026(3) dt.27-07-2026 2/3

Rakba 07.5 dhur (Seven Katha five dhur) situated under Mauza Ismailchak, Sonepur which is lawful in physical possession of the petitioner. (ii) For issuance of order/s, directions or appropriate writ to direct the Respondent No. 8 don't bother peaceful physical possession of the petitioner over the land appertaining to Khata No. 90, Khesra No. 440 Rakba 07.5 dhur (Seven Katha five dhur) situated under Mauza Ismailchak, Sonepur through his ancestors under Succession right. (iii) For any other relief/reliefs for which the petitioner may found entitled.” 3. Mr. Dhananjay Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that it will suffice if the petitioner is allowed to agitate the matter before the Collector, Saran at Chapra (respondent no. 4). 4. Learned State counsel has no objection to it. 5. In that background, the writ petition stands disposed of allowing the petitioners to approach the Collector, Saran at Chapra (respondent no. 4) within a period of four weeks who shall be duty bound to look into the matter and pass Patna High Court CWJC No.8851 of 2026(3) dt.27-07-2026 3/3 an appropriate order, in accordance with law, preferably within a period of four months thereafter. 6. The final outcome of the order passed by the Collector, Saran at Chapra will decide the fate of the land in question. (Rajiv Roy, J) Adnan/- U