IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.47344 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-92 Year-2026 Thana- KHANPURA District- Samastipur ====================================================== 1. Ankit Kumar S/O Arun Singh @ Arun Kumar Singh R/o Vill.- Raini, P.S -Khanpur, District - Samastipur, Bihar 2. Ramvilas Singh @ Rambilash Singh S/O Late Lal Bihari Singh R/o Vill.-Raini, P.S - Khanpur, District - Samastipur, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Vinay Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Uma Shankar Prasad Singh, APP For the Informant : Mr. Dilip Kumar Roy, Advocate Ms. Monika Kumari, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 2 24-07-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Khanpura P.S. Case No. 92 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 352, 351(3), 3(5) of the BNS and Section 27 of theArms Act.

3. The allegation against the petitioners is that they surrounded the informant, namely Sanjeet Singh while he was returning home. It is further alleged that petitioner no.2, namely Ramvilas Singh ordered to shoot informant upon which petitiner Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47344 of 2026(2) dt.24-07-2026 2/3 no.1, namely Ankit Kumar pulled out a pistol and fired two rounds at informant. Luckily, he managed to escape. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that even if FIR is accepted in its entirety, does not disclose that the informant sustained any injury during the alleged occurrence. He further submits that there is an old dispute between the parties and both parties are co-sharers and there is already a pending title suit between the parties. 5. Learned APP assisted by counself for the informant vehemently opposed the prayer of bail.

6. Having considered the rival submissions advanced on behalf of the parties, and keeping in view that no injury to the informant is alleged, as is evident from the FIR itself, and further considering that the petitioners and the informant are co-sharers and are involved in a long-standing land dispute, in respect of which a title suit is already pending, let both above named petitioners, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial Court, within a period of four weeks of the order, are directed to be released on bail furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned concerned Court, Samastipur, where the case is pending in connection with Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47344 of 2026(2) dt.24-07-2026 3/3 Khanpura P.S. Case No. 92 of 2026 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS. (Ranjan Kumar Jha, J) rishabh/- U T

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.47344 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-92 Year-2026 Thana- KHANPURA District- Samastipur ====================================================== 1. Ankit Kumar S/O Arun Singh @ Arun Kumar Singh R/o Vill.- Raini, P.S -Khanpur, District - Samastipur, Bihar 2. Ramvilas Singh @ Rambilash Singh S/O Late Lal Bihari Singh R/o Vill.-Raini, P.S - Khanpur, District - Samastipur, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Vinay Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Uma Shankar Prasad Singh, APP For the Informant : Mr. Dilip Kumar Roy, Advocate Ms. Monika Kumari, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 2 24-07-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Khanpura P.S. Case No. 92 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 352, 351(3), 3(5) of the BNS and Section 27 of theArms Act.

3. The allegation against the petitioners is that they surrounded the informant, namely Sanjeet Singh while he was returning home. It is further alleged that petitioner no.2, namely Ramvilas Singh ordered to shoot informant upon which petitiner Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47344 of 2026(2) dt.24-07-2026 2/3 no.1, namely Ankit Kumar pulled out a pistol and fired two rounds at informant. Luckily, he managed to escape. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that even if FIR is accepted in its entirety, does not disclose that the informant sustained any injury during the alleged occurrence. He further submits that there is an old dispute between the parties and both parties are co-sharers and there is already a pending title suit between the parties. 5. Learned APP assisted by counself for the informant vehemently opposed the prayer of bail.

6. Having considered the rival submissions advanced on behalf of the parties, and keeping in view that no injury to the informant is alleged, as is evident from the FIR itself, and further considering that the petitioners and the informant are co-sharers and are involved in a long-standing land dispute, in respect of which a title suit is already pending, let both above named petitioners, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial Court, within a period of four weeks of the order, are directed to be released on bail furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned concerned Court, Samastipur, where the case is pending in connection with Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47344 of 2026(2) dt.24-07-2026 3/3 Khanpura P.S. Case No. 92 of 2026 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS. (Ranjan Kumar Jha, J) rishabh/- U T