IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.49793 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-290 Year-2026 Thana- MADHUBANI TOWN District-Madhubani ====================================================== Birju Sah @ Virju Sah S/o Kishori Sah R/o Mohalla - Maharajganj, ward no. 13, P.s.- Madhubani Town, Distt.- Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Bhavesh Kumar Sah For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Mritunjay Kumar Nirala ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 2 22-07-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has antecedent of five cases under the Excise Act and allegation is of recovery of 276 litres of liquor from a rented room of three accused out of which 131.115 litres of liquor is alleged to have been recovered from the rented room of the petitioner. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was not arrested from the spot as such nothing was Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49793 of 2026(2) dt.22-07-2026 2/3

recovered from his conscious possession and even the alleged recovery is from a room which does not belong to the petitioner nor he had taken the room on rent, but since he had antecedent under the Excise Act as such he came to be implicated based on secret information which is the easiest way to implicate someone without holding a proper investigation. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. 6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on Provisional anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty-five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Madhubani Town P.S. Case No. 290 of 2026, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS. 7. It is made clear that thereafter the learned Trial Court shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in the event if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of more than five cases then it would be presumed that petitioner, for the purposes of seeking anticipatory bail, had concealed his antecedent before this Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49793 of 2026(2) dt.22-07-2026 3/3

Court, as such, the provisional anticipatory bail order shall not be confirmed, but after verification if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of five cases, in that event the provisional anticipatory bail order shall be confirmed forthwith. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Sumit/- U T

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.49793 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-290 Year-2026 Thana- MADHUBANI TOWN District-Madhubani ====================================================== Birju Sah @ Virju Sah S/o Kishori Sah R/o Mohalla - Maharajganj, ward no. 13, P.s.- Madhubani Town, Distt.- Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Bhavesh Kumar Sah For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Mritunjay Kumar Nirala ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 2 22-07-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has antecedent of five cases under the Excise Act and allegation is of recovery of 276 litres of liquor from a rented room of three accused out of which 131.115 litres of liquor is alleged to have been recovered from the rented room of the petitioner. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was not arrested from the spot as such nothing was Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49793 of 2026(2) dt.22-07-2026 2/3

recovered from his conscious possession and even the alleged recovery is from a room which does not belong to the petitioner nor he had taken the room on rent, but since he had antecedent under the Excise Act as such he came to be implicated based on secret information which is the easiest way to implicate someone without holding a proper investigation. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. 6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on Provisional anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty-five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Madhubani Town P.S. Case No. 290 of 2026, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS. 7. It is made clear that thereafter the learned Trial Court shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in the event if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of more than five cases then it would be presumed that petitioner, for the purposes of seeking anticipatory bail, had concealed his antecedent before this Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49793 of 2026(2) dt.22-07-2026 3/3

Court, as such, the provisional anticipatory bail order shall not be confirmed, but after verification if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of five cases, in that event the provisional anticipatory bail order shall be confirmed forthwith. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Sumit/- U T