Patna High Court
Punam Devi v. The State of Bihar
- Decision date
- 2026-07-15
- Text availability
- Full text
- Judges
- Prabhat Kumar Singh
Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗
Connected provisions and cases
No further provision or case links are recorded.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17395 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1299 Year-2025 Thana- NAWADA District- Nawada ====================================================== 1. Punam Devi Son of Ram Saran Singh R/o Village - Gariba, P.S. - Rajauli, District - Nawada. 2. Ram Saran Singh Son of Late Hari Singh R/o Village - Gariba, P.S. -Rajauli, District - Nawada. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. barti devi W/o balram paswan, P.S- Gariba, P.S.- Rajauli, Distt- Nawada ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ram Prawesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey, A.P.P. For the O.P. No. 2 : Mr. Birendra Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 5 15-07-2026 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners, informant and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. Petitioners apprehend arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 87 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. 3. It is alleged these petitioners kidnapped minor daughter of informant while she was going to pick up her nephew from the school.
4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. During investigation, victim was recovered and in her Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17395 of 2026(5) dt.15-07-2026 2/2 statement, recorded under Section 183 BNSS, has denied the factum of kidnapping and has stated that no one had kidnapped her. Age of the victim is assessed as 19 years. Petitioners claim clean antecedent. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State as well as learned counsel for the informant vehemently opposed the bail application. 6. Considering statement of the victim recorded under Section 183 BNSS, this anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada in connection with Nawada (Town) P. S. Case No. 1299 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Navya/- U T