IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10290 of 2022 ====================================================== Raghu Nandan Rajak Son of Guni Rajak, Resident of Village- Dholi Rand, Police Station- Bankey Bazar, District- Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Food and Civil Supplies Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Commissioner, Magadh Division, Gaya. 3. The District Magistrate, Gaya. 4. The Sub Divisional Officer, Sherghati, Gaya. 5. The Block Supply Officer, Bankey Bazar, Gaya. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manish Kumar No2, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Arvind Ujjwal ( SC4 ) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. G. ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY ORAL ORDER 4 14-07-2026 1. The Learned counsel for the petitioner intends to withdraw the Writ petition, as the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed and nothing remains for the adjudication. 2. Therefore, the Writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. (G. Anupama Chakravarthy, J) Aryan/- U

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10290 of 2022 ====================================================== Raghu Nandan Rajak Son of Guni Rajak, Resident of Village- Dholi Rand, Police Station- Bankey Bazar, District- Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Food and Civil Supplies Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Commissioner, Magadh Division, Gaya. 3. The District Magistrate, Gaya. 4. The Sub Divisional Officer, Sherghati, Gaya. 5. The Block Supply Officer, Bankey Bazar, Gaya. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manish Kumar No2, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Arvind Ujjwal ( SC4 ) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. G. ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY ORAL ORDER 4 14-07-2026 1. The Learned counsel for the petitioner intends to withdraw the Writ petition, as the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed and nothing remains for the adjudication. 2. Therefore, the Writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. (G. Anupama Chakravarthy, J) Aryan/- U