IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7136 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-105 Year-2024 Thana- COMPLAINT CASE District-Kishanganj ====================================================== Rahim Ansari Son of Javed Ansari Resident of village- Khagra Machhmara, ward no 33, P.S.- Kishanganj, District- Kishanganj ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Mangali Khatoon Wife of Rahim Ansari Resident of village- Khagra Machhmara, ward no 33, P.S.and Po- Kishanganj, District- Kishanganj ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Amal Kumar Sinha, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Kanhaiya Kishore (App.100) Mr.Ram Prawesh Kumar, Adv.for OP-2 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 4 13-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for opposite party no. 2. 2. The petitioner, husband of opposite party no. 2, apprehends his arrest in a complaint case punishable for the offence under Section 498(A) & other allied sections of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

3. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the dispute between the parties has been settled amicably through the process of mediation and for this, the petitioner offered to pay Rs. 3,00,000/- (Rupees Three Lakhs), as full and final settlement amount and opposite party no. 2 has accepted the offer and gave her consent. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7136 of 2026(4) dt.13-07-2026 2/3 4. Learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 does not dispute and confirms the fact regarding settlement entered into between the parties. 5. Here, it is relevant to mention that earlier, with consent of the parties, the matter was referred to Mediation & Conciliation Centre of Patna High Court to explore the possibility of settlement between the parties, which has been resolved in terms of Memorandum of Agreement annexed with Mediator’s report. 6. Considering the fact that dispute between the parties has been resolved, the prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioner is allowed.

7. Let the petitioner, as named above, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Kishanganj in connection with Complaint Case No. 105 of 2024, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure / Section 482 of the B.N.S.S. with further condition that petitioner shall abide by all the terms & conditions, mentioned in Memorandum of Agreement, failing which, Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7136 of 2026(4) dt.13-07-2026 3/3 learned Court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail-bond of the petitioner. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) anay U T

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7136 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-105 Year-2024 Thana- COMPLAINT CASE District-Kishanganj ====================================================== Rahim Ansari Son of Javed Ansari Resident of village- Khagra Machhmara, ward no 33, P.S.- Kishanganj, District- Kishanganj ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Mangali Khatoon Wife of Rahim Ansari Resident of village- Khagra Machhmara, ward no 33, P.S.and Po- Kishanganj, District- Kishanganj ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Amal Kumar Sinha, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Kanhaiya Kishore (App.100) Mr.Ram Prawesh Kumar, Adv.for OP-2 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 4 13-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for opposite party no. 2. 2. The petitioner, husband of opposite party no. 2, apprehends his arrest in a complaint case punishable for the offence under Section 498(A) & other allied sections of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

3. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the dispute between the parties has been settled amicably through the process of mediation and for this, the petitioner offered to pay Rs. 3,00,000/- (Rupees Three Lakhs), as full and final settlement amount and opposite party no. 2 has accepted the offer and gave her consent. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7136 of 2026(4) dt.13-07-2026 2/3 4. Learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 does not dispute and confirms the fact regarding settlement entered into between the parties. 5. Here, it is relevant to mention that earlier, with consent of the parties, the matter was referred to Mediation & Conciliation Centre of Patna High Court to explore the possibility of settlement between the parties, which has been resolved in terms of Memorandum of Agreement annexed with Mediator’s report. 6. Considering the fact that dispute between the parties has been resolved, the prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioner is allowed.

7. Let the petitioner, as named above, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Kishanganj in connection with Complaint Case No. 105 of 2024, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure / Section 482 of the B.N.S.S. with further condition that petitioner shall abide by all the terms & conditions, mentioned in Memorandum of Agreement, failing which, Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7136 of 2026(4) dt.13-07-2026 3/3 learned Court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail-bond of the petitioner. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) anay U T