IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42729 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-209 Year-2024 Thana- SABAUR District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== Bhavesh Kumar @ Bikki Kumar @ Vickey S/o Late Subodh Singh Resident of Village- Hario, P.S.- Bihpur, Distt- Bhagalpur ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dilip Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anil Kumar Singh No. 1, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 2 13-07-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that specific allegation of firing is against Piyush and the informant alleges that Piyush fired causing firearm injury on his stomach. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that even presuming what has been alleged is true without admitting then petitioner is not alleged to have fired causing firearm injury to the informant.

4. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposes Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42729 of 2026(2) dt.13-07-2026 2/2 the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner and submits that informant suffered firearm injury on account of firing made by Piyush, it is next submitted no doubt, he is not alleged to have fired but then presence of the petitioner along with other accused at the place of occurrence emboldened Piyush to commit the occurrence of firing. 5. Considering the submissions made by the learned A.P.P. for the State, the Court is not inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6. Hence, the prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. (Satyavrat Verma, J) vikram/- U T

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42729 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-209 Year-2024 Thana- SABAUR District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== Bhavesh Kumar @ Bikki Kumar @ Vickey S/o Late Subodh Singh Resident of Village- Hario, P.S.- Bihpur, Distt- Bhagalpur ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dilip Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anil Kumar Singh No. 1, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 2 13-07-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that specific allegation of firing is against Piyush and the informant alleges that Piyush fired causing firearm injury on his stomach. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that even presuming what has been alleged is true without admitting then petitioner is not alleged to have fired causing firearm injury to the informant.

4. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposes Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42729 of 2026(2) dt.13-07-2026 2/2 the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner and submits that informant suffered firearm injury on account of firing made by Piyush, it is next submitted no doubt, he is not alleged to have fired but then presence of the petitioner along with other accused at the place of occurrence emboldened Piyush to commit the occurrence of firing. 5. Considering the submissions made by the learned A.P.P. for the State, the Court is not inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6. Hence, the prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. (Satyavrat Verma, J) vikram/- U T