Patna High Court
Laldhari Sah @ Laldhari Prasad v. The State of Bihar
- Decision date
- 2026-07-09
- Text availability
- Full text
- Judges
- Prabhat Kumar Singh
Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗
Connected provisions and cases
No further provision or case links are recorded.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27029 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-17 Year-2026 Thana- Pachpakdi District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1. Laldhari Sah @ Laldhari Prasad S/o Ramanand Sah R/o Vilage- Karihaniya, P.S.- Pachpakari, District- East Champaran 2. Ramkishun Sah @ Ramkishun Prasad S/o Ramanand Sah R/o Vilage-Karihaniya, P.S.- Pachpakari, District- East Champaran 3. Jawahar Sah S/o Bhola Sah R/o Vilage- Karihaniya, P.S.- Pachpakari, District- East Champaran 4. Virendra Sah S/o Sitaram Sah R/o Vilage- Karihaniya, P.S.- Pachpakari, District- East Champaran 5. Jotnarayan Sah S/o Awadh Bihari Sah R/o Vilage- Karihaniya, P.S.-Pachpakari, District- East Champaran 6. Niraj Singh @ Niraj Kumar S/o Chandraveer Singh R/o Vilage- Padumker, P.S.- Patahi, District- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Asif Kalim, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anil Kumar Singh No. 1, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 3 09-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.
2. Petitioners apprehend arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 351(2), 352, 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 118(1), 303(2) and 329(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. 3. As per prosecution case, all the F.I.R. named accused persons, including these petitioners and 20-25 unknown Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27029 of 2026(3) dt.09-07-2026 2/3 miscreants came and started throwing wood and other items on the land of informant. Upon objection, petitioner no. 1 gave iron rod blow on the head of informant, petitioner no. 2 assaulted the brother of informant with iron rod. It is further alleged that the accused person assaulted informant’s side with various weapons and co-accused Sujay Sah took Rs. 1,500/-. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. As a matter of fact, a free fight took place between the parties on account of land dispute in which both sides sustained injuries. Allegation of assault is general and omnibus and there is no allegation of any specific overt act against the petitioners. Case and counter case. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposed the bail application and submits that petitioner no. 6 has got four criminal antecedents. 6. Considering the criminal antecedents, prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioner no. 6 is refused.
7. However, considering the nature of accusation and genesis of occurrence, the anticipatory bail with regard to petitioner nos. 1 to 5 is allowed and it is ordered that the above named petitioner nos. 1 to 5 in the event of their Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27029 of 2026(3) dt.09-07-2026 3/3 arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sikrahana, Dhaka, East Champaran in connection with Pachpakari P. S. Case No. 17 of 2026, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Navya/- U T