IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.72337 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1537 Year-2014 Thana- SARAN COMPLAINT CASE District-Saran ====================================================== Daya Shankar Choudhary Son of Mohan Lal Choudhary, Resident of Village-Chatara, P.S.- Kopa, District- Saran. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. Puja Devi @ Puja, Wife of Daya Shankar Choudhary, VillageP.O.- Chatri, P.S.- Kopa, District- Saran. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 3 06-07-2026 No one is present on behalf of the petitioner, however, learned A.P.P. for the State is present. 2. On the previous date also i.e. on 14.05.2026 no one was present on behalf of the petitioner and the case was adjourned. 3. Since the petitioner has no interest to pursue this matter which is of the year 2018, accordingly, the present Cr. Misc. Application stands dismissed for default due to non-prosecution. (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) Ritik/- U T

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.72337 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1537 Year-2014 Thana- SARAN COMPLAINT CASE District-Saran ====================================================== Daya Shankar Choudhary Son of Mohan Lal Choudhary, Resident of Village-Chatara, P.S.- Kopa, District- Saran. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. Puja Devi @ Puja, Wife of Daya Shankar Choudhary, VillageP.O.- Chatri, P.S.- Kopa, District- Saran. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 3 06-07-2026 No one is present on behalf of the petitioner, however, learned A.P.P. for the State is present. 2. On the previous date also i.e. on 14.05.2026 no one was present on behalf of the petitioner and the case was adjourned. 3. Since the petitioner has no interest to pursue this matter which is of the year 2018, accordingly, the present Cr. Misc. Application stands dismissed for default due to non-prosecution. (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) Ritik/- U T