IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43373 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-14 Year-2026 Thana- NARHATT District- Nawada ====================================================== Pintu Kumar @ Maigar Yadav Son of Baleshwar Yadav @ Baleshwar Prasad Yadav @ Baleshwar Prasad Resident of Village- Hazidhab, P.S.- Narhat, District- Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sunil Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Prem Kumar Jha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 2 03-07-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has antecedent of twelve cases out of which seven cases are under the Excise Act and is in custody since 21.05.2026 and allegation is of recovery of 82 litres of liquor from a bush near the house of the petitioner. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was not arrested from the spot, as such, nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and even alleged recovery is from a place, which does not belong to the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43373 of 2026(2) dt.03-07-2026 2/2

petitioner, but then is adjacent to his house and he came to be implicated at the instance of Chaukidar with whom he is on an inimical term. It is next submitted that police in majority of cases implicating innocent persons either at the behest of Chaukidar, local person, secret information and confessional statement in a mechanical manner without holding a proper investigation. 5. Learned A.P.P. opposes the bail application. 6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner, above-named, is directed to be released on regular bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Narhat P. S. Case No.14 of 2026. 7. The application stands allowed. (Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43373 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-14 Year-2026 Thana- NARHATT District- Nawada ====================================================== Pintu Kumar @ Maigar Yadav Son of Baleshwar Yadav @ Baleshwar Prasad Yadav @ Baleshwar Prasad Resident of Village- Hazidhab, P.S.- Narhat, District- Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sunil Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Prem Kumar Jha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 2 03-07-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has antecedent of twelve cases out of which seven cases are under the Excise Act and is in custody since 21.05.2026 and allegation is of recovery of 82 litres of liquor from a bush near the house of the petitioner. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was not arrested from the spot, as such, nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and even alleged recovery is from a place, which does not belong to the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43373 of 2026(2) dt.03-07-2026 2/2

petitioner, but then is adjacent to his house and he came to be implicated at the instance of Chaukidar with whom he is on an inimical term. It is next submitted that police in majority of cases implicating innocent persons either at the behest of Chaukidar, local person, secret information and confessional statement in a mechanical manner without holding a proper investigation. 5. Learned A.P.P. opposes the bail application. 6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner, above-named, is directed to be released on regular bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Narhat P. S. Case No.14 of 2026. 7. The application stands allowed. (Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T