IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43180 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-59 Year-2026 Thana- RAJPUR District- Buxar ====================================================== Lav Kumar S/O Nand Kishore Chauhan R/O Vill - Bijhaura, P.S.- Kukurahan, Distt.- Buxar ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sunil Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Ms.Shaheen Begum ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 2 03-07-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and allegation is of recovery of 46.060 litres of liquor from three motorcycles. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was not arrested from the spot, as such, nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and came to be implicated based on the disclosure made by Murli Mishra, who disclosed that one of the motorcycle was purchased by the petitioner, but then, it is submitted that petitioner intended to Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43180 of 2026(2) dt.03-07-2026 2/3

purchase the motorcycle from Murli Mishra, but then deal could not be went through nor there is any documentary evidence on record showing that the motorcycle was transferred in the name of the petitioner. 5. Learned A.P.P. opposes the anticipatory bail application. 6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on provisional anticipatory bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs.500/- (Rupees Five Hundred) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Rajpur P. S. Case No.59 of 2026, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. 7. The application stands allowed. 8. It is made clear that the learned trial Court after accepting the provisional bail bonds of the petitioner shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in the event, if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of even one case, then it would be presumed that petitioner for the purposes of obtaining Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43180 of 2026(2) dt.03-07-2026 3/3

anticipatory bail had concealed his antecedent before this Court, in that event, the present provisional anticipatory bail order shall not be confirmed, but if on verification, it is found that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent, in that event, the provisional anticipatory bail order shall be confirmed forthwith. (Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43180 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-59 Year-2026 Thana- RAJPUR District- Buxar ====================================================== Lav Kumar S/O Nand Kishore Chauhan R/O Vill - Bijhaura, P.S.- Kukurahan, Distt.- Buxar ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sunil Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Ms.Shaheen Begum ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 2 03-07-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and allegation is of recovery of 46.060 litres of liquor from three motorcycles. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was not arrested from the spot, as such, nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and came to be implicated based on the disclosure made by Murli Mishra, who disclosed that one of the motorcycle was purchased by the petitioner, but then, it is submitted that petitioner intended to Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43180 of 2026(2) dt.03-07-2026 2/3

purchase the motorcycle from Murli Mishra, but then deal could not be went through nor there is any documentary evidence on record showing that the motorcycle was transferred in the name of the petitioner. 5. Learned A.P.P. opposes the anticipatory bail application. 6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on provisional anticipatory bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs.500/- (Rupees Five Hundred) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Rajpur P. S. Case No.59 of 2026, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. 7. The application stands allowed. 8. It is made clear that the learned trial Court after accepting the provisional bail bonds of the petitioner shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in the event, if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of even one case, then it would be presumed that petitioner for the purposes of obtaining Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43180 of 2026(2) dt.03-07-2026 3/3

anticipatory bail had concealed his antecedent before this Court, in that event, the present provisional anticipatory bail order shall not be confirmed, but if on verification, it is found that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent, in that event, the provisional anticipatory bail order shall be confirmed forthwith. (Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T