IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.2081 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-127 Year-2025 Thana- PAHARKATTA District- Kishanganj ====================================================== Jeeshan @ Jisan @ Md. Jisan Son of Abdul Rahman Resident of Village -Jhinakhor PS- Pothiya Dist- Kishanganj ... ... Appellant/s Versus The State of Bihar and another ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr.Radha Mohan Singh For the Respondent/s : Ms.Usha Kumari 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 3 03-07-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned Special P.P. for the State. 2. The learned counsel for the appellant, at the outset, seeks permission to withdraw the appeal with liberty to file a fresh Criminal Miscellaneous Application as cognizance was taken subsequent to filing of the instant appeal under the POCSO Act also. 3. Permission is accorded. 4. Accordingly, instant appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. 5. The office is directed to return all the Annexures to the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant except the vakalatnama. (Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.2081 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-127 Year-2025 Thana- PAHARKATTA District- Kishanganj ====================================================== Jeeshan @ Jisan @ Md. Jisan Son of Abdul Rahman Resident of Village -Jhinakhor PS- Pothiya Dist- Kishanganj ... ... Appellant/s Versus The State of Bihar and another ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr.Radha Mohan Singh For the Respondent/s : Ms.Usha Kumari 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 3 03-07-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned Special P.P. for the State. 2. The learned counsel for the appellant, at the outset, seeks permission to withdraw the appeal with liberty to file a fresh Criminal Miscellaneous Application as cognizance was taken subsequent to filing of the instant appeal under the POCSO Act also. 3. Permission is accorded. 4. Accordingly, instant appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. 5. The office is directed to return all the Annexures to the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant except the vakalatnama. (Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T