Patna High Court
Monu @ Manjeet Kumar v. The State of Bihar
- Decision date
- 2026-07-01
- Text availability
- Full text
- Judges
- Anshuman
Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗
Connected provisions and cases
No further provision or case links are recorded.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23510 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-583 Year-2022 Thana- COMPLAINT CASE - PATNA CITY District- Patna ====================================================== 1. Monu @ Manjeet Kumar S/o Late Madan Sah R/o Postal Park Chauraha, Between Road No. 2 and 3, P.S.- Kankarbagh, Dist. -Patna 2. Premlata Devi W/o Late Madan Sah R/o Postal Park Chauraha, Between Road No. 2 and 3, P.S.- Kankarbagh, Dist. -Patna 3. Pawan Kumar @ Gyan Chand Prakash @ Gyan Prakash @ Pawan Sao S/o Late Madan Sah R/o Postal Park Chauraha, Between Road No. 2 and 3, P.S.-Kankarbagh, Dist. -Patna 4. Chandan Kumar S/o Raj Kumar Das R/o Postal Park Chauraha, Between Road No. 2 and 3, P.S.- Kankarbagh, Dist. -Patna 5. Ranbir Kumar @ Ranvijay Kumar S/o Ramji Sah R/o Postal Park Chauraha, Between Road No. 2 and 3, P.S.- Kankarbagh, Dist. -Patna ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Rita Devi W/o Sri Ashok Sah R/o Nuruddinganj, Rashtrawadi Chauraha, P.S.- Malsalami, Distt.- Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjiv Sharan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar No. 2, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 4 01-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners are apprehending arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 583(C)/2022, lodged under Section 498(A), 323, 341, 379, 354, 504, 506, 120(B) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. As per the prosecution, the FIR has been lodged Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23510 of 2026(4) dt.01-07-2026 2/3 against the accused persons alleging that the informant’ daughter was subjected to cruelty on account of demand for dowry. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. Counsel further submits that there is no scope for settlement as the husband has been sent to custody on false allegations. Therefore, as per his instructions, the husband is not willing to settle the dispute and wants to contest the case. 5. Learned counsel for Opposite Party No. 2, on the other hand, submits that she is ready to settle the matter but fairly submits that a series of cases are pending between the parties. 6. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioners.
7. In the present facts and circumstances, as the dispute is between the husband and the wife, and for whatever reason the parties are not willing to settle the matter, let the above-named petitioners be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the Trial Court within a period of 4 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand) each as mentioned in Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23510 of 2026(4) dt.01-07-2026 3/3 Section 2(1)(d) of the BNSS, 2023 to the satisfaction of J.M.F.C. Class, Patna City, in connection with Complaint Case No. 583(C)/2022, subject to the conditions as laid down U/s 482(2) of the BNSS, 2023. (Dr. Anshuman, J.) Aman Kumar/- U T