IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41166 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-414 Year-2026 Thana- JAHANABAD District- Jehanabad ====================================================== Golu Kumar Son of Mahesh Yadav @ Mahesh Prasad Resident of Village-Vidyanagar Colony, Pakari, P.S.- Beur, District- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Sharma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 2 29-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Jehanabad (Karauna) P.S. Case No.414 of 2026 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 30(a), 32, 36, 41 of the Bihar Prohibition (Amendment) & Excise Act. 3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that from a KIA Sonex car altogether 288 litres of illicit foreign liquor was recovered.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that nothing has been recovered from the possession of this petitioner. It has further been submitted that the witnesses of the seizure list are police personnel and police have not complied Section 105 of the BNSS while Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41166 of 2026(2) dt.29-06-2026 2/2 making seizure. It has further been submitted that petitioner is not concerned in any way with the said car; petitioner is merely a passer-by. It has further been submitted that the petitioner is having no criminal antecedent and he is in judicial custody since 10.05.2026. 5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State. 6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the court of learned Exclusive Special Excise Court-II, Jehanabad in connection with Jehanabad (Karauna) P.S. Case No.414 of 2026. (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) durgesh/- U T

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41166 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-414 Year-2026 Thana- JAHANABAD District- Jehanabad ====================================================== Golu Kumar Son of Mahesh Yadav @ Mahesh Prasad Resident of Village-Vidyanagar Colony, Pakari, P.S.- Beur, District- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Sharma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 2 29-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Jehanabad (Karauna) P.S. Case No.414 of 2026 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 30(a), 32, 36, 41 of the Bihar Prohibition (Amendment) & Excise Act. 3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that from a KIA Sonex car altogether 288 litres of illicit foreign liquor was recovered.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that nothing has been recovered from the possession of this petitioner. It has further been submitted that the witnesses of the seizure list are police personnel and police have not complied Section 105 of the BNSS while Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41166 of 2026(2) dt.29-06-2026 2/2 making seizure. It has further been submitted that petitioner is not concerned in any way with the said car; petitioner is merely a passer-by. It has further been submitted that the petitioner is having no criminal antecedent and he is in judicial custody since 10.05.2026. 5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State. 6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the court of learned Exclusive Special Excise Court-II, Jehanabad in connection with Jehanabad (Karauna) P.S. Case No.414 of 2026. (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) durgesh/- U T